인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
DBpia Top 10%동일한 주제분류 기준으로최근 2년간 이용수 순으로 정렬했을 때
해당 논문이 위치하는 상위 비율을 의미합니다.
초록· 키워드
Beginning with Robert Darnton’s question of “what was revolutionary about the French Revolution”, the article intends to challenge the validity of his male-oriented interpretation of the Revolution. In order to shed new light from feminist perspectives on the very nature and heritage of the French Revolution, the article consists of three parts. The first part reconstructs in chronological order the love/hate relationships between the Revolution and women. The second part examines how two historical films ― <Theroigne de Mericourt> and <Chouans>, which were released to celebrate the bicentennial of the Revolution ― portrays and (mis)represents women’s roles and fortunes during the stormy days of the Revolution. The third part attempts to reappraise positive/negative effects and short-term/everlasting legacies of the Revolutions on the welfare and livelihood of French women.
After critical reviews on recent studies primarily by Dominique Godineau, Joan Landes and Olwen Hufton, the author concludes that as far as women were concerned the French Revolution turned out to be a ‘conservative’ revolution, if not counter-revolutionary. In fact, the paternalistic aspects of the Revolution contributed to the prohibition of women from participating at the public realms, whereas male Republicans unduly reprimanded women for the failure of the Revolution. No wonder ‘bad movies’ such as <Theroigne de Mericourt> and <Chouans> continued to depict women not as active de fenders of popular sovereignty but as passive victims of the Revolution.
In this respect, opposite to François Furet well-known phrase, ‘the French Revolution is not over yet’ for most women in the world. They still have to struggle to remove all kinds of chains and prejudices, which are designed to subject them to the interest and caprice of male members.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지After critical reviews on recent studies primarily by Dominique Godineau, Joan Landes and Olwen Hufton, the author concludes that as far as women were concerned the French Revolution turned out to be a ‘conservative’ revolution, if not counter-revolutionary. In fact, the paternalistic aspects of the Revolution contributed to the prohibition of women from participating at the public realms, whereas male Republicans unduly reprimanded women for the failure of the Revolution. No wonder ‘bad movies’ such as <Theroigne de Mericourt> and <Chouans> continued to depict women not as active de fenders of popular sovereignty but as passive victims of the Revolution.
In this respect, opposite to François Furet well-known phrase, ‘the French Revolution is not over yet’ for most women in the world. They still have to struggle to remove all kinds of chains and prejudices, which are designed to subject them to the interest and caprice of male members.
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Ⅰ. 머리말
- Ⅱ. 프랑스혁명의 이중성 : 남성들만의 반쪽 짜리 혁명
- Ⅲ. (반)혁명, 사랑, 그리고 여성 : 영상적 독해
- Ⅳ. 혁명의 패러독스
- Ⅴ. 맺음말 : “프랑스혁명은 아직 끝나지 않았다”
- 불문 초록
- 영문 초록
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-926-015123055
