인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
This paper is an object in 1940's to expose the aspect of the nationalism discussion which it pursues through the narration strategy of the history novel at the time. In this paper, we would like to an aspect and meaning of the nationalism discussion will be looked into against ‘King Sejo’〈세조대왕〉 which the change over of the recognition is found as the meaning of a conversion when being the series of the history novel of in 1920’s of it in 1940’s.
The Japanese imperialism requested that the Japanese of the nation Chosun became for the war mobilization in 1940’s. However, it was afraid of that it becomes Japanese in fact. In conclusion, “Naesunilche”(to be one between Japan And Chosun) was the symbol for the war mobilization. Lee Guang-su was accepted “Huanminhwa”(to be national people in japan) and extended his the nationalism discussion and changed. And Lee Guang-su emphasizing the blood with the unitary nation is asserted that the Japanese and blood are identical. The history narration is changed the use of the substitution of the memory and the new nationalism discussion tries to be formed.
‘King Sejo’〈세조대왕〉 is the text showing the change of the nation discussion of Lee Guang-su’s in 1940’s. It contrasts with a dichotomy and an individual is described for the historical probability. As to this, a marginalization is the history of the public a thing as the narration strategy of the history narrative. ‘King Sejo’〈세조대왕〉 reconstructs the memory and it forms the history narrative freshly. The rapport with the Japan nation tried to be drawn in the critical eyes of the descriptor about the Confucian legitimacy.
Lee Guang-su tried to form “Huanminhwa” to the nationalism discussion by the narration strategy of the history narrative and reconfiguration of the memory. However, this is unable to be completely included in the imperialism discussion and shows a “Huanminhwa” discussion and difference. In 1940’s, his history novel was the expression of the desire which tries to draw the Japanized nation. However, the nationalism discussion where it is found in the history narrative remained as the refracted display.
The Japanese imperialism requested that the Japanese of the nation Chosun became for the war mobilization in 1940’s. However, it was afraid of that it becomes Japanese in fact. In conclusion, “Naesunilche”(to be one between Japan And Chosun) was the symbol for the war mobilization. Lee Guang-su was accepted “Huanminhwa”(to be national people in japan) and extended his the nationalism discussion and changed. And Lee Guang-su emphasizing the blood with the unitary nation is asserted that the Japanese and blood are identical. The history narration is changed the use of the substitution of the memory and the new nationalism discussion tries to be formed.
‘King Sejo’〈세조대왕〉 is the text showing the change of the nation discussion of Lee Guang-su’s in 1940’s. It contrasts with a dichotomy and an individual is described for the historical probability. As to this, a marginalization is the history of the public a thing as the narration strategy of the history narrative. ‘King Sejo’〈세조대왕〉 reconstructs the memory and it forms the history narrative freshly. The rapport with the Japan nation tried to be drawn in the critical eyes of the descriptor about the Confucian legitimacy.
Lee Guang-su tried to form “Huanminhwa” to the nationalism discussion by the narration strategy of the history narrative and reconfiguration of the memory. However, this is unable to be completely included in the imperialism discussion and shows a “Huanminhwa” discussion and difference. In 1940’s, his history novel was the expression of the desire which tries to draw the Japanized nation. However, the nationalism discussion where it is found in the history narrative remained as the refracted display.
#이광수
#1940년대
#세조대왕
#역사 내러티브
#민족 담론의 굴절
#역사적 개연성
#기억의 재구성
#공적 역사
#주변화
#민족
#국민
#Lee Guang-su
#1940’s
#King Sejo
#historical narration
#the refraction of the nation discussion
#historical probability
#the reconfiguration of the memory
#public history
#marginalization
#ethnic
#nation
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- 1. 서론
- 2. 황민화 담론과 민족의 재편성으로서 역사 내러티브
- 3. 『세조대왕』의 서사 전략과 민족주의 담론의 양상
- 4. 1940년대 이광수 역사 담론의 의미와 토포스(topos)적 인식-결론을 대신하여
- 참고문헌
- [Abstract]
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-810-003643560
