인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
학술저널
DBpia Top 0.5%
오류 신고하기해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
피에르 노라의 『기억의 장소』에 나타난 ‘기억’의 개념 Le concept de ‘mémoire’ dans Les lieux de mémoire par Pierre Nora
피에르 노라의 『기억의 장소』에 나타난 ‘기억’의 개념
초록·키워드
This article aims to examine the concept of ‘the memory’. This concept appeared in the historiographical discourse because of the discord between the history and the memory, and between the official history and the unofficial history. It seems that the history has no authority over the memory. Especially, the reason why the discourse of the memory dominates in recent years is the increased interests in the study of “how was it really” of the Holocaust, which incites in its turn to study “how was it really memorized”. In Korea, ‘the purification of the past’ played the same role.
The full bloom of the discourse of the memory in the Les Lieux de memoire reflects not only the inherent relation between the history and the memory, but the fact that France lost the honor of the leading country of the History. It is thus necessary to establish the identity of France by means of the memory inspiring the honor of the nation. So, Les lieux de memoire is a national history of France. In the historiographical dimension, this collective book can be estimated as a return to the national history which was disfavored by the social history.
In fact, Les lieux de memoire are not the places of the memory but those of the history. For example, what we can hear in such a place of memory as Jean d’Arc is neither the sacred voice, nor the popular memory, but the history reconstructed through the critical examination of the source, that is the memory. Despite of the title, the book edited by Pierre Nora doesn’t give the predominance to the memory. It doesn’t insist that the memory is more pure and nearer to the fact than the history. The discourse that the memory is true is no other than a myth. The history can’t be replaced by the memory.
The full bloom of the discourse of the memory in the Les Lieux de memoire reflects not only the inherent relation between the history and the memory, but the fact that France lost the honor of the leading country of the History. It is thus necessary to establish the identity of France by means of the memory inspiring the honor of the nation. So, Les lieux de memoire is a national history of France. In the historiographical dimension, this collective book can be estimated as a return to the national history which was disfavored by the social history.
In fact, Les lieux de memoire are not the places of the memory but those of the history. For example, what we can hear in such a place of memory as Jean d’Arc is neither the sacred voice, nor the popular memory, but the history reconstructed through the critical examination of the source, that is the memory. Despite of the title, the book edited by Pierre Nora doesn’t give the predominance to the memory. It doesn’t insist that the memory is more pure and nearer to the fact than the history. The discourse that the memory is true is no other than a myth. The history can’t be replaced by the memory.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2012-926-004177002
