인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
In the advent of globalization and transnational migration, nation-states tend to realign the boundaries of citizenship to deal with economic openness for prosperity and to respond to the universal norms of human rights. To examine the state and extent of realignment of citizenship in Korea and Japan, this article compares the institutional processes to introduce voting rights of expatriate citizens and resident foreigners. Both countries have experienced similar process in establishing political rights of non-resident nationals: petitions from expatriate organizations, lawsuits and court decisions to revise voting rights limited in national territory, and revision of election law for expatriate votes in homeland. However, political rights of resident foreigners traced quite different trajectories. Despite active civil movements for local voting rights organized by resident foreigners including Jainichi Koreans and supported by many local governments for several decades, foreign dwellers are still deprived of political rights in Japan. In contrast, Korea became the first Asian country to introduce local voting rights of foreigners. This institutional change has been achieved not by bottom-up mobilization but by top-down leadership. This process has been accelerated by several factors: political leaders intention to occupy a advantageous position to conciliate Janichi Korean"s rights with Japanese government, the influence of democratization process, and the absence of organized resistance against foreigners" political rights.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2015-900-001703177
