메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
서강대학교 신학연구소 신학과 철학 신학과 철학 제19호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
53 - 77 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Missionary accommodation belonged essentially to the program of Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith, as it was with the policy of the Jesuit missionaries. Significantly enough, however, the Jesuits found the missionaries of the Roman Congregation among their early adversaries in the Rites Controversy. Had there been only the Friars on the opposing side to the Jesuits, there would probably not have been a Roman condemnation of the Rites, at least not in a categorical and extreme form. In the background of the Rites Controversy, there were in fact different conceptions of accommodation, or different options in choosing partners in dialogue, and different starting points for inculturation. That was at the very heart of the Rites Controversy. Hence, in order to shed some more lights on the nature of the Rites Controversy this article examines closely two contrasting conceptions of accommodation. It considers in comparison the principles of accommodation that undergirded decisions of the Jesuits especially in China beginning with Matteo Ricci, and those promoted in contrast by the Roman Congregation.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (30)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0