인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
The meaning of or has been considered the same as the logical connective ∨ (inclusive disjunction), which means that at least one disjunct is true. Ariel and Mauri (2018, 2019), examining the Santa Barbara Corpus, argue that inclusivity is too strong because the speaker may commit to none of the alternatives and too weak because she can commit to all alternatives. Instead, they suggest that the core meaning of or is ‘alternativity’ on some level (the propositional level or a non-propositional level), which is procedural, non-truth-conditional and conventionally implicated. They classify or constructions according to the types of their ‘explicatures’: Raised options, Higher-Level Category, Conjunctive, Narrowed, Choice, and Exhaustive readings. In this paper, I argue for the standard account of or, that is, or means inclusivity. Although some alternatives are distinct on a non-propositional level, the difference may contribute to the truth-conditional content through pragmatic enrichment. I deal with metalinguistic disjunction to show the process of pragmatic enrichment. In addition, I point out that some of Ariel and Mauri’s ‘explicatures’ of or constructions are better analyzed as pragmatically derived implicatures.
#inclusivity
#alternativity
#explicature
#non-truth-conditional
#procedural
#metalinguistic disjunction
#pragmatic enrichment
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- 1. Introduction
- 2. The “Various Readings” of or Constructions
- 3. Interpretations of or Constructions
- 4. Metalinguistic Disjunction
- 5. Summary and Conclusion
- References
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-701-000659952
