인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2020.4
- 수록면
- 109 - 117 (9page)
- DOI
- 10.5143/JESK.2020.39.2.109
이용수
초록· 키워드
Objective: The goal of this study was to identify the recognition rate of the safety signs used to communicate the risk in industry, and to improve the safety signs revealed to have low recognition rate.
Background: The safety signs are used to communicate the existence of risk throughout the symbols regardless of the worker"s knowledge level. Especially, the importance of the pictogram is emphasized by the increase of foreign workers. However, there has been no study testing and improving recognition rate of the safety signs.
Method: A total of seven safety signs were selected for further improvement based on a series of tests suggested by ISO 9186 (Graphical symbols) which requires more than 66% of recognition rate to use the safety signs. Then, the safety signs were improved by a guidance provided by the AIGA (American Institute of Graphic Arts). Finally, the rank tests were performed on the various designs to select three alternative designs for each sign, which is best to describe the meaning of each safety sign. Finally, a survey was conducted to select the final improvement safety sign among the three improvement designs for each eight signs.
Results: As a result, six safety signs (emergency exit, corrosive warning, lift no boarding, machine /equipment no boarding, sensitive material warning, green cross) showed an increase in understanding and achieved 66% of the recognition rate suggested by ISO. However, two safety signs (no object movement, laser beam warning) confirmed the need for further improvement. As a result of analyzing the difference in understanding before and after the improvement of the safety signs, the "no object movement" sign increased 13.25% from the recognition rate of 0% before improvement, but did not meet the ISO standard, and the "laser beam warning sign" decreased in understanding rate.
Conclusion: In this study, the design of eight safety signs was improved. The design of the six safety signs, except for "no object movements" and "laser beam warnings", could significantly increase the comprehension rate, when used in actual industrial sites.
Application: The results could be used to prevent the industrial accidents by providing a better understanding of the safety signs.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지Background: The safety signs are used to communicate the existence of risk throughout the symbols regardless of the worker"s knowledge level. Especially, the importance of the pictogram is emphasized by the increase of foreign workers. However, there has been no study testing and improving recognition rate of the safety signs.
Method: A total of seven safety signs were selected for further improvement based on a series of tests suggested by ISO 9186 (Graphical symbols) which requires more than 66% of recognition rate to use the safety signs. Then, the safety signs were improved by a guidance provided by the AIGA (American Institute of Graphic Arts). Finally, the rank tests were performed on the various designs to select three alternative designs for each sign, which is best to describe the meaning of each safety sign. Finally, a survey was conducted to select the final improvement safety sign among the three improvement designs for each eight signs.
Results: As a result, six safety signs (emergency exit, corrosive warning, lift no boarding, machine /equipment no boarding, sensitive material warning, green cross) showed an increase in understanding and achieved 66% of the recognition rate suggested by ISO. However, two safety signs (no object movement, laser beam warning) confirmed the need for further improvement. As a result of analyzing the difference in understanding before and after the improvement of the safety signs, the "no object movement" sign increased 13.25% from the recognition rate of 0% before improvement, but did not meet the ISO standard, and the "laser beam warning sign" decreased in understanding rate.
Conclusion: In this study, the design of eight safety signs was improved. The design of the six safety signs, except for "no object movements" and "laser beam warnings", could significantly increase the comprehension rate, when used in actual industrial sites.
Application: The results could be used to prevent the industrial accidents by providing a better understanding of the safety signs.
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Method
- 3. Results & Discussion
- 4. Conclusion
- References
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
