메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
(American Institutes for Research) (University of Oregon) (University of Oregon) (University of Oregon)
저널정보
한국교육행정학회 Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Vol.2
발행연도
수록면
33 - 46 (14page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
이 논문의 연구방법이 궁금하신가요?
🏆
연구결과
이 논문의 연구결과가 궁금하신가요?
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

Within a response to intervention (RTI) framework, many schools initially group students into tiers on the basis of normative achievement. Using a screener and benchmarks with curriculum-based measurement (CBM), students are classified as being academically “at-risk” or not. In the current study, we present a validity argument for the use of a mathematics CBM as a classification tool within RTI and explore the relation between a fall CBM administration and state accountability test results using a large sample in Oregon (located in the Pacific Northwest in the United States) through regression analyses. Our analyses indicate a strong relation between easyCBM® and the state achievement tests, which suggests that accurate screening of students using CBM can help teachers and administrators make more informed decisions for both instruction and school resource allocation. For more successful RTI, educators should implement effective and efficient decision-making processes based on assessment data, and researchers should continue exploring ways to improve the classification accuracy of CBM and incorporate instructional effects.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!

목차

  1. ABSTRACT
  2. Introduction
  3. Methods
  4. Results
  5. Discussion
  6. References

참고문헌

참고문헌 신청

최근 본 자료

전체보기