인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 한국교육행정학회 Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Vol.2
- 발행연도
- 2017.12
- 수록면
- 33 - 46 (14page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
Within a response to intervention (RTI) framework, many schools initially group students into tiers on the basis of normative achievement. Using a screener and benchmarks with curriculum-based measurement (CBM), students are classified as being academically “at-risk” or not. In the current study, we present a validity argument for the use of a mathematics CBM as a classification tool within RTI and explore the relation between a fall CBM administration and state accountability test results using a large sample in Oregon (located in the Pacific Northwest in the United States) through regression analyses. Our analyses indicate a strong relation between easyCBM® and the state achievement tests, which suggests that accurate screening of students using CBM can help teachers and administrators make more informed decisions for both instruction and school resource allocation. For more successful RTI, educators should implement effective and efficient decision-making processes based on assessment data, and researchers should continue exploring ways to improve the classification accuracy of CBM and incorporate instructional effects.
#Curriculum-based measurement
#response to intervention
#classification accuracy
#test validity
#decision making
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- ABSTRACT
- Introduction
- Methods
- Results
- Discussion
- References