메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술대회자료
저자정보
Jim Daily III (Journal of Medicinal Food)
저널정보
한국식품영양과학회 한국식품영양과학회 학술대회발표집 2021 KFN International Symposium and Annual Meeting [초록집]
발행연도
2021.10
수록면
278 - 279 (2page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Eighteen years ago, in October of 2003, we published the first issue of the Journal of Medicinal Food (JMF) that included editorial board members from the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition (KFN). This marked a unique collaboration between the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition, publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., a North American editorial board headed by Editor-in-Chief Dr. Sheldon Hendler and a Korean editorial board headed by Editor-in-Chief Dr. Kun-Young Park. At the beginning, JMF was not listed in the Science Citation Index and only published four papers per year. Over the years with much hard work, visits to promote the journal to ISI and to get it included as an SCI-expanded and then a full SCI journal. As we progressed, the number of submissions increased as did the number of issues. Today JMF is a high-quality monthly scientific publication with an impact factor of 2.786. This is a great achievement and our current Editors-in-Chief, Drs Jeongmin Lee and Michael Zemel, deserve a lot of credit, as do the past editors and society members who built the foundation that made this possible. This is indeed a great achievement, but I believe it is just the beginning; with continued work and careful management, JMF can keep progressing with a steadily increasing impact factor. While I believe this to be the future, it cannot be taken for granted. Impact factors can certainly increase over time, but they can also decrease. We must continue our efforts to make a better journal. I would now like to explore a few ideas about how to improve the journal and increase the impact factor.
There is no question that impact factors play a major role in attracting high quality papers. Investigators want to publish in high impact journals. However, we must make sure that in attempting to improve the impact factor we do nothing that will detract from the quality of the journal. Therefore, I would like to discuss ways to improve the impact factor by taking actions that improve the quality and reputation of the journal. We often focus on the numerator in the impact factor calculation, but we should not neglect the denominator. Just a few uncited papers can be deadly to the impact factor. Therefore, we need to carefully consider each submission. We do not want to focus only on citations only, but it is important to consider them. There are also ways to include content that does not go into the denominator. Articles such as editorials, commentaries, news articles, announcements, and opinion articles are not normally considered “citable”, and therefore do not go into the denominator of the impact factor calculation. When used properly, these can add valuable content to the journal and improve the impact factor. An example of how profound of an effect it can have is what happened to the FASEB Journal in 1988 and 1989. In 1988 it had an impact factor of 0.24, however that year they negotiated on how it should be calculated ... 전체 초록 보기

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0