인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2017.1
- 수록면
- 169 - 192 (24page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
The present study was conducted to improve and secure the reliability of the performance assessment and grading of the Korean speaking test. To develop the speaking portion of the 'Test of Proficiency in Korean', this core research currently looks to increase the validity and reliability of the speaking assessment. This study explored the effectiveness of training sessions with raters. To uncover the affective factors of grading, the raters were divided into three distinct groups: native-experienced, native non-experienced, and non native raters. All of the participants were graduate students majoring in Korean language education. The traing sessions preceded in three stages. After the first session, all raters identified their problems, and continued with their grading. The results were analyzed with a multi-dimentional rasch model using the FACETS program. The results showed that experienced raters scored assessments using relatively strict grading criteria. The three groups showed different tendencies on scoring items, constructs, and measurement use. However, experience or nativeness did not affect the internal consistency of the individual rater. Their internal consistency of scoring was influenced by the process of setting up their criterion or by the eventual fatigue with grading. Future studies should examine experienced Korean teachers in different types of traing sessions. Despite the limitations, this study provides significance in this context as the first paper on the training of the Korean speaking performance test.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
