지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This paper critically reviews the salient features of AGREE advocated in late Minimalism. It is to show that AGREE-based grammar is doomed to suffer from the shortcomings in both conceptual and empirical points of view. Conceptually, the argument that AGREE is a more economical operation than MOVE does not fit with the hypothesis that both AGREE and MOVE is a virtually conceptually necessary(VCN) operation. Empirically, expletive construction, a classic example for AGREE-based analysis, is to be recapitulated by MOVE-based analysis. That is, it is to show that AGREE-based analysis cannot account for some prominent characteristics of there-construction.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (28)
참고문헌 신청
박연미 / 2013 / 복사이론의 위상 연구 / 언어연구 29(2):225~244
Belletti, A / 1988 / The case of unaccusatives / Linguistic Inquiry 19:1~34
Bobaljik, D / 2002 / A-Chains at the PF-interface: Copies and covert movement / Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20:197~267
Bobaljik, D / 1996 / Subject positions and the roles of TP / Linguistic Inquiry 27:195~236
Bokovi, Ž. / 2002 / A-movement and the EPP / Syntax 5:167~218
Belletti, A / 1988 / The case of unaccusatives / Linguistic Inquiry 19:1~34
Bobaljik, D / 2002 / A-Chains at the PF-interface: Copies and covert movement / Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20:197~267
Bobaljik, D / 1996 / Subject positions and the roles of TP / Linguistic Inquiry 27:195~236
Bokovi, Ž. / 2002 / A-movement and the EPP / Syntax 5:167~218
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0