지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2006.1
- 수록면
- 178 - 183 (6page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Background and Objectives：Currently, the drug-eluting stent (DES) has been widely used because of its excellentclinical outcome. We compared the utilization patterns and clinical outcomes between the DES and the baremetal stent (BMS) in the real world. Subjects and Methods：We retrospectively reviewed the stent registry atthe Catholic Medical Center between January 2002 and October 2004. There were 1120 patients treated with DES(n=1837) who were compared to 910 patients who received BMS implantation (n=1238). Results：Patients withde novo lesions in the DES group more frequently had multivessel disease and received a greater number of stentsthan those in BMS group (p<0.001). The mean diameter of inserted stents was smaller in the DES group (p<0.001). The follow-up rate for clinical and angiographic evaluations at 6 months after stenting was 91% and65% (n=592) in the BMS group and 90% and 74% (n=829) in the DES group, respectively. The rate of majoradverse cardiac events (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization) at 6 months was7.3% in the DES group and 17.5% in the BMS group (p<0.001). The rates of target vessel revascularization inthe DES group and in the BMS group were 4.2% and 12.9%, respectively (p<0.001). Conclusion：The patientsin the DES group had longer length, smaller diameter and higher number of placed stents, compared to the BMSgroup. The rates of revascularization and major adverse cardiac events in the DES group were lower than thosein the BMS group. (Korean Circulation J 2006;36:178-183)
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0