인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
This paper explores the nature of complement CPs in English on the one hand and Korean/Mongolian on the other. Moulton (2015, 2019) observes the dual faces of complement CPs and proposes that the regular complement CP in English can be a predicate. Details aside, from the perspective that a CP is a phase because of its propositionality (Chomsky 1995, et seq.), Moulton's idea that CPs are predicates has unwanted consequences about phases and their governing principles like PIC, since a predicate CP cannot be a phase to Moulton. As such, he must assume that even non-propositional predicates can be a phase, which is too strong a claim to make correct predictions about movement and ellipsis. In this regard, this paper proposes that what looks likes a predicate is not exactly a CP but a layer of the left periphery. To accommodate this idea, this paper adopts the spirit of the left periphery of Rizzi (2004, et seq.) and proposes a new structure for the complement clause. To be specific, the higher RP (Relator Phrase) is an argument as has been traditionally assumed and the lower ForceP is a predicate in the sense that Moulton argues about "CP". This paper extends the proposed analysis to a more plausible analysis of similar constructions in Korean and Mongolian.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
