인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 저자정보
초록·키워드
According to Gregory Schopen and Jeffrey Bass, the vinaya of the Mūlasarvāstivāda tradition places more importance on the recitation of texts, and the practice of meditation in monasteries is not particularly encouraged. Nevertheless, Bass also notes that the Mūlasarvāstivāda tradition recognizes communal practice of meditation in monasteries as well and stipulates how meditation halls should be constructed. In this article, referring to both textual passages and on-site observations of Indian rock-cut monasteries, I would like to reconfirm that meditation was indeed practiced in Indian Buddhist monasteries and discuss the location of meditational practice within the monasteries. Although the relevant texts primarily discuss surface monasteries (vihāra), I assume they are applicable to rock-cut monasteries as well.
A Sanskrit manuscript corresponding to the Chinese Madhyamāgama, no. 139 clearly shows that monks practiced meditation on a decomposing corpse on a bed in their monastic cell.
On the other hand, as pointed out by Bass, passages from the Poṣadhavastu of the Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya describe the concrete structure of meditation halls. According to this text, these “meditation halls” (prahāṇaśālā) have cells (layana). These “meditation halls” seem to be similar in structure to what is usually called “vihāra caves.” This suggests that small cells in the vihāra-type caves could have been used for zracticing meditation.
In addition, the episodes of some monks making noise and disturbing the meditating monks found in the Abhisamācārikā of the Mahāsāṅghika tradition give us the impression that monks meditated together in a large hall. Some of the relevant passages have parallels in vinaya texts of other Buddhist traditions. I suspect this “large hall” may well have been the central hall of the vihāra cave.
Since it is not always easy to match textual descriptions with actual monastic sites, the apparent agreements between the texts and caves are significant. Through comparison between the textual passages and cave sites, I attempt to shed light on the manner of meditative practices in Indian cave monasteries.
A Sanskrit manuscript corresponding to the Chinese Madhyamāgama, no. 139 clearly shows that monks practiced meditation on a decomposing corpse on a bed in their monastic cell.
On the other hand, as pointed out by Bass, passages from the Poṣadhavastu of the Mūlasarvāstivāda-vinaya describe the concrete structure of meditation halls. According to this text, these “meditation halls” (prahāṇaśālā) have cells (layana). These “meditation halls” seem to be similar in structure to what is usually called “vihāra caves.” This suggests that small cells in the vihāra-type caves could have been used for zracticing meditation.
In addition, the episodes of some monks making noise and disturbing the meditating monks found in the Abhisamācārikā of the Mahāsāṅghika tradition give us the impression that monks meditated together in a large hall. Some of the relevant passages have parallels in vinaya texts of other Buddhist traditions. I suspect this “large hall” may well have been the central hall of the vihāra cave.
Since it is not always easy to match textual descriptions with actual monastic sites, the apparent agreements between the texts and caves are significant. Through comparison between the textual passages and cave sites, I attempt to shed light on the manner of meditative practices in Indian cave monasteries.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0102-2023-022-001653967
