Humanities
Social science
Natural science
Engineering
Medical science
Agriculture and Fishery
Art and Kinesiology
Interdisciplinary Studies
General Social Science
Business Management
Tourism
Education
Military Science
Library and Information Science
Law
Sociology
Journalism and Media Studies
Psychological Science
Political Science and Diplomacy
Geography
Public Administration
Economics
International Trade
Anthropology
Other Social Science
General Natural Science
Physics
Biology
Life Sciences
Mathematics/Statistics
Astronomy
Earth Science
Chemistry
Other Natural Science
General Engineering
Architectural Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Industrial Engineering
Material/Energy Engineering
Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Marine and Ocean Engineering
Chemical Engineering
Computer Science
Other Engineering
General Medical Science
Nursing Science
Veterinary
Pharmacy
Traditional Korean Medicine
Basic Medicine
Clinical Medicine
Other Medicine
General Agriculture and Fishery
Agriculture
Fishery Science
Food Science
Forestry
Animal Husbandry
Marine Transportation Studies
Other Agriculture and Fishery
Akaroot
DBpia provides support to continue researcher activities such as academic research/group support/education.
Community
It is a networking space where researchers can widely promote their work and expertise, and create opportunities for new collaborations.
논문 기본 정보
- Type
- Academic journal
- Author
- Published
- 2025.6
- Pages
- 184 - 203 (20page)
- DOI
- 10.69473/iasr.2025.28.2.184
Usage
Abstract· Keywords
This article analyzes, and discusses the most recent EU ’s Arctic states’ strategies towards their Arctic region, and draws 3 common strategy realms out of them, and presents the prospects for each of the 3 common strategy realms following further analyses and discussions relevant to the common strategy realms. The realms are climate change impacts and the responses, reinforcing security against Russia, and wellbeing of the indigenous people. It should be noted that cooperation among the EU Artic states and other policy actors in the region, the Arctic Council, international agreements, non-EU states in the Arctic, observers to the Arctic Council, and the EU or non-EU organizations representing the indigenous in the Arctic, should be considered as prerequisite that underlies effective implementation of the primary policies in the EU’s Arctic states’ 3 common strategy realms. Last but not least, if it would be tough for the EU Arctic states to be engaged in given issues in the Arctic region with other policy actors even when taking that approach for solutions, then, it is invariably significant that the EU Arctic states endeavor to derive binding agreements concerned with the given issues, at least, among themselves if necessary, showing cohesiveness.
Update DetailsIf the title, authors, table of contents,or page range is incorrect, please let us know!
Contents
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Literature Review
- The EU’s Strategy for the Arctic
- The Finland’s Strategy for the Arctic Region
- The Sweden’s 2020 Strategy for the Arctic Region
- The Denmark’s Strategy for the Arctic Region
- The Discussions of the Primary Polices for the 3 Common Strategy Realms in the EU’s Arctic Region
- Climate Change Impact Mitigation and the Response, and the Sustainable Use of Energy
- Reinforcing Security
- Wellbeing of the Indigenous
- Conclusion
- References
References
Add ReferencesRecently viewed articles
UCI(KEPA) : I410-151-25-02-093619409