Skip to main
Institutional Access
If you certify, you can access the articles for free.
Check out your institutions.
ex)Hankuk University, Nuri Motors
Help KOR
Subject

Basic article information

Author
(Autonomous University of Barcelona) (Autonomous University of Barcelona)
Journal
Center for International Area Studies International Area Studies Review Vol.29 No.2
Report Errors

Citations 0

Search

    Abstract·Keywords

    China’s rise as a key economic partner to Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) has generated intense debate over whether its regional engagement constitutes neocolonialism, a debate that has reached analytical impasse. This article advances beyond the neocolonial label by applying a structured four-dimensional assessment, economic, cultural, technological, and political, against explicitly operationalized neocolonial criteria. Although China’s engagement produces identifiable asymmetries across all four dimensions, none satisfies the three constitutive conditions required for a neocolonial characterization as defined here. The article introduces the concept of “negotiated asymmetric interdependence” to describe what neither the neocolonial framework nor the official “win-win” narrative captures: a configuration in which structural power differentials are real and consequential, yet LAC states retain meaningful, if bounded, agency over the terms of engagement. It differentiates this concept from complex interdependence, asymmetric interdependence, dependency with agency, South–South cooperation, and post-hegemonic accounts of regional order, and grounds it in evidence spanning the high-exposure cases most favorable to the neocolonial thesis, within-case analyses of Ecuador’s oil-backed borrowing and the Las Bambas conflict, and the region’s largest economies, Brazil, Chile, and Mexico.

    Recently viewed View more