지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
We should not overlook the problems of the current research achievement evaluation system in Korean studies, which modeled after the evaluation systems popular in the field of natural science or the field of which fundamental researches rely on the academic achievements from abroad.
Improper research achievement evaluation system causes distortion of research pattern and direction, and ultimately results in creation of deformed academia. We already see these phenomena in all the field of humanities. The efforts for fundamental works, necessary to the scholars themselves and the academic world became weakened; and the academic works with broad perspective and comprehensive structure disappeared. Scholars prefer to produce short articles with narrow view rather than go through with tedious and painful works, such as translation of or annotation on the original works. Unless we try to change these circumstances, the academic productivity will decrease, in spite of the increased number of articles.
Considering the uniqueness of classical Korean literature study, we may suggest creation or reevaluation of the works from the following fields:
1. Philology on classical works.
2. Research and recording of orally handed down literary works.
3. Translation or annotation of classical works, and publication of research material collection.
4. Publication of dictionaries for technical terms in classical Korean literature and related field.
The works described in the above are normally published in separate books rather than in journals. We may need more research on them until we establish criteria for them. However, to begin with, it is poignant to change our views and the existing evaluation system so that we can fully appreciate the importance of fundamental works, which properly reflect the characteristics of Korean studies as well as humanities in general and are vital in strengthening of academic foundation.
Improper research achievement evaluation system causes distortion of research pattern and direction, and ultimately results in creation of deformed academia. We already see these phenomena in all the field of humanities. The efforts for fundamental works, necessary to the scholars themselves and the academic world became weakened; and the academic works with broad perspective and comprehensive structure disappeared. Scholars prefer to produce short articles with narrow view rather than go through with tedious and painful works, such as translation of or annotation on the original works. Unless we try to change these circumstances, the academic productivity will decrease, in spite of the increased number of articles.
Considering the uniqueness of classical Korean literature study, we may suggest creation or reevaluation of the works from the following fields:
1. Philology on classical works.
2. Research and recording of orally handed down literary works.
3. Translation or annotation of classical works, and publication of research material collection.
4. Publication of dictionaries for technical terms in classical Korean literature and related field.
The works described in the above are normally published in separate books rather than in journals. We may need more research on them until we establish criteria for them. However, to begin with, it is poignant to change our views and the existing evaluation system so that we can fully appreciate the importance of fundamental works, which properly reflect the characteristics of Korean studies as well as humanities in general and are vital in strengthening of academic foundation.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 자료 연구의 평가
3. 번역/주석의 평가
4. 전문사전 편찬의 평가
5. 맺는 말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
『국어국문학』에 반영된 고전문학 연구의 흐름
국어국문학
2012 .04
-
고려시대 국학고전의 번역 현황과 과제
동화와 번역
2007 .01
-
Japanese Learning of Korean Culture through Korean Classical Novels
Korea Journal
2013 .06
-
고전문학교육의 실행 현황과 향후 과제
국어교육연구
2008 .08
-
초등학교 고전소설 교육의 의의와 방향
어문학
2005 .06
-
고전번역학의 학적 대상으로서의 고전 개념의 문제
민족문화
2019 .06
-
고전문학 연구의 소통과 대중화를 위한 방안 모색
국어국문학
2013 .12
-
해방 60년 국문학 연구의 성과와 과제 - 고전시가 분야를 중심으로 하여 -
우리말글
2005 .08
-
빅데이터와 고전문학 연구방법론
어문론집
2019 .06
-
한국고전문학 연구의 성과와 전망 : 2000년 이후를 중심으로
동서인문학
2008 .12
-
고전소설 교육 방향의 반성과 제안
국어교육연구
2014 .10
-
한국 고전문학 연구의 회고와 전망
국어국문학
2012 .08
-
漢文敎育學 硏究方法論
漢文敎育論集
2011 .01
-
한국의 당대(1999-2013) 번역학 연구동향
번역학연구
2013 .12
-
대하소설의 문화콘텐츠화에 대한 전망
어문학
2009 .03
-
교과별 학업적 자기효능감과 학업성취간의 종단적 탐색-영어교과를 중심으로-
외국학연구
2017 .01
-
페미니즘 번역연구의 현황과 특징
통번역교육연구
2019 .01
-
The Education and Research of Western Classical Studies in Korea
서양고전학연구
2009 .12
-
고전소설교육 패러다임의 점검과 전망
국어교육연구
2017 .02
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-013647884