지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Some qualities about Kim Sa-ryang's view of literary language are considered in this thesis. To do this, primarily, the atmosphere of the times by the 1940s and the national literature are considered.
When the common use of the Japan language is going to be stronger, Chosun writers should not be free from a sense of crisis. In the situation of their mother tongue being degraded into 'a seed of a problem', many Chosun writers are tainted rapidly with the imperial motto, that is, a mother tongue of a people without a nation is meaningless. Finally, many 'the Kim Yong-jes' cry 'Japan, our country!'. Naturally, the mother tongue loses the priority. On the background of such atmosphere of the times, Kim Sa-ryang begins to write his works in dual languages. The Qualities of Kim Sa-ryang's view of literary language are as follows.
In the first place, the mother tongue should be used basically. It is assured by his comment, "Chosun literature can be established by Chosun writers' using Chosun language. He knows well the risk resulted from the use of the Japanese language instead of using mother tongue. In spite of this, the motive of his writing in Japanese is the writer's strategy. It is a passive resistance against the Japanese imperialism
In the second place, the aim of his using Japanese is for having 'the intermediate effort'. It is an effort to inform the Japanese and the world having a universal humanity of Chosun or Chosun people's reality, and thus to accuse the reality objectively. To do so, for standing up to the strategy of the Japan's rule, he devise an idea; changing the notion, a nation vs a nation into a people vs a people. By doing this, he overcomes the imperial view of language, that is one language is more superior to the others. and also, by setting the Japanese language as a people's language, he stress that Chosun language as a people's language, though in the Japan's reign, equals to Japanese language.
In the third place, his view of literary language is opposed to the Japan-Korea-unison(內?一體). After all, the Japanese suppression for Kim Sa-ryang becomes harder. He dares to go to Yeon-an, not to refract his view. In this respect, his going for Yeon-an is a brave determination for the subjecthood of otherness; to perfect his view of literary language. His view of literary language is 'an output' much focused on what he writes, than by what he writes.
Accordingly, his view of dual literary language is a realistic alternatives for the Chosun language's survival, under the special case of a colony.
When the common use of the Japan language is going to be stronger, Chosun writers should not be free from a sense of crisis. In the situation of their mother tongue being degraded into 'a seed of a problem', many Chosun writers are tainted rapidly with the imperial motto, that is, a mother tongue of a people without a nation is meaningless. Finally, many 'the Kim Yong-jes' cry 'Japan, our country!'. Naturally, the mother tongue loses the priority. On the background of such atmosphere of the times, Kim Sa-ryang begins to write his works in dual languages. The Qualities of Kim Sa-ryang's view of literary language are as follows.
In the first place, the mother tongue should be used basically. It is assured by his comment, "Chosun literature can be established by Chosun writers' using Chosun language. He knows well the risk resulted from the use of the Japanese language instead of using mother tongue. In spite of this, the motive of his writing in Japanese is the writer's strategy. It is a passive resistance against the Japanese imperialism
In the second place, the aim of his using Japanese is for having 'the intermediate effort'. It is an effort to inform the Japanese and the world having a universal humanity of Chosun or Chosun people's reality, and thus to accuse the reality objectively. To do so, for standing up to the strategy of the Japan's rule, he devise an idea; changing the notion, a nation vs a nation into a people vs a people. By doing this, he overcomes the imperial view of language, that is one language is more superior to the others. and also, by setting the Japanese language as a people's language, he stress that Chosun language as a people's language, though in the Japan's reign, equals to Japanese language.
In the third place, his view of literary language is opposed to the Japan-Korea-unison(內?一體). After all, the Japanese suppression for Kim Sa-ryang becomes harder. He dares to go to Yeon-an, not to refract his view. In this respect, his going for Yeon-an is a brave determination for the subjecthood of otherness; to perfect his view of literary language. His view of literary language is 'an output' much focused on what he writes, than by what he writes.
Accordingly, his view of dual literary language is a realistic alternatives for the Chosun language's survival, under the special case of a colony.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
2. 전환기를 바라보는 두 조선문인의 눈
3. 자기고민과 순응 사이의 거리 재기
4. 현실타협적 글쓰기와 그 내면풍경
5. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
말을 두고 말해본다
중국조선어문
2017 .03
-
일본이 식민지에서 자행한 국어상용화 정책에 관한 일고찰
일본문화학보
2019 .11
-
1930년대 조선어의 위상과 현대시의 형성과정
한국시학연구
2010 .04
-
Japanese Language - Literature in Korea
Korea Journal
1985 .11
-
The Making of the Korean Language
Korea Journal
1974 .08
-
국어과 교육과정을 위한 문학의 위상 설정
문학교육학
2011 .01
-
The Relationship between the Korean and Japanese Languages
한글
1981 .12
-
국어교육에서의 언어정체성과 문법 교육의 역할
국어교육연구
2016 .06
-
Language Context and Language Experience : Adult Language Learners' Self-Concepts in Second Language Academic Context
새한영어영문학회 학술발표회 논문집
2007 .05
-
주변어로서 조선어, ‘국어’ 되기
코기토
2009 .02
-
日本語 対外 普及論理의 考察 : 日帝下 韓에 대한 경우를 中心으로
일본문화학보
2002 .02
-
The Effects of Language Difference on L2 Learners’ Language Performance
미래영어영문학회 학술대회 자료집
2017 .12
-
고등학생들의 비규범적 통신 언어 사용과 국어 교육의 과제
어문연구
2006 .01
-
근대계몽기 국문 담론 양상과 언문일치
어문연구
2009 .01
-
Language Policy and Language Education in North Korea
Korea Journal
1991 .03
-
어문운동의 교육적 함의와 실현 양상 연구
국어교육연구
2013 .08
-
중국인 학습자의 한국어 억양 발달 과정에서 나타난 언어 보편성과 모국어 전이-억양의 문법적 기능을 중심으로-
이중언어학
2019 .01
-
언어와 비어(非語)
동서인문학
2008 .12
-
Development of Korean Language
Korea Journal
1963 .07
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-810-013762031