메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계 대한건축학회논문집 - 계획계 제20권 제8호
발행연도
2004.8
수록면
104 - 113 (10page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study aims to prove unreasonable rules of outdoor service facilities on investigating how household density
influences the amount of outdoor service facilities in housing and the remnant of outdoor space excluding outdoor service
facilities, and to propose methods improving the regulation of outdoor service facilities in consideration of residential
environment's quality.
For this purpose, the whole outdoor space was divided into two different-quality areas, 1st outdoor spaces and 2nd
outdoor spaces; The former consists of landscape area and the remnant of outdoor space excluding 2nd outdoor spaces.
That is to say, these are the naturally and easily accessible surroundings without specific purposes. The latter is
composed of outdoor sports facilities, playgrounds for children, roads and outdoor parking facilities, which are obligatory
facilities, the places for restricted purpose and residents.
As a result of analyzing the influence of household density on the area of both spaces, the 2nd outdoor spaces were
revealed to increase in area with a rise of household density and in consequence of that the 1st outdoor spaces, on the
contrary, diminished. Because the 2nd outdoor spaces' areas are added up by the number of houses. The effect was more
obvious and deeper particularly in high density housing.
But, satisfying only the obligatory facilities' areas does not always guarantee good quality of the whole outdoor space.
Because the 1st outdoor spaces are one of important factors of outdoor design even those are not composed of
obligatory facilities.
Therefore, to complete even and good quality of residential environment in the whole outdoor space, the regulation of
outdoor service facilities should be applied in accordance with household density and we should legislate a regulation on
the remnant of outdoor space excluding outdoor service facilities as well as meet the areas of outdoor service facilities.

목차

Abstract

1.서론

2.옥외공간의 성격 및 부대복리시설의 기준

3.현황분석 및 시설기준의 문제점

4.1차적 옥외공간의 면적현황과 종합적 분석

5.종합적 분석 및 결론

참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-540-014284906