메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
부산경남사학회 역사와경계 역사와경계 제50집
발행연도
2004.3
수록면
123 - 148 (26page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
In this paper I pursued and analysed how the British official discourses and public accounts of the 1857 Indian rebellion constructed and utilized metaphors and imbalances of gender to define the popular uprising as merely a 'Sepoy Mutiny'. It is agreed that the uprising of 1857 starting out as a revolt of the sepoys was great armed challenge to the British colonial rule, attracting people from all sections of Indian society, Hindus and
Muslims, peasants and landlords, artisans and merchants etc. The British, however, dismissed the popular insurgency, a coalition of civil and military forces, as a chaotic and disorganized sepoy's revolt. The matrix of such accounts was memsahibs, the English
women in India, being allegedly raped and killed by sepoys. The women were inscribed as pathetic helpless victims. My argument is that the gender ideology was thereafter emerged to embody the courageous manly English heros, saving English feminity from the unmanly 'sexually voracious' Indian men(sepoys), establishing the masculine British superiority through gendered rhetorics. By personifying Indian sepoys in feminine terms the British
integrated links between gender and imperialism. The gender ideology was in short mobilized to justify the brutal suppression of the 'mutiny' and to confirm the necessity of the British imperial control in India.

목차

【Abstract】

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-014463133