메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국항만경제학회 한국항만경제학회지 한국항만경제학회지 제20집 제1호
발행연도
2004.9
수록면
173 - 187 (15page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Japanese ports have been stagnant year after year. This condition affects Japanese manufacturing, and competition in the international market of products because in demand deteriorates. It is a result of the following three points: (1)Because a lack of government planning and the construction of a container wharf, ports container increased, and Japanese ports became stagnant: (2)Japanese ports lost a market principle because the government did not think about the cost of harbor distribution: (3)on the other hand, with the government taking a protection policy of coastal vessels, the ports ware in an even worse situation
The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport understood this reality and planned the super nucleus harbor design based on a market principle. It held the committee meeting for super nucleus harbors in October, 2002. In December, it held the second committee meeting and made a standard of the choice of super nucleus harbors. Based on that standard, it invited public participation in choosing a harbor manager. Depending on the appeal, seven harbors (Tokyo, Kawasaki, Yokohama, Nagoya, Yokkaichi, Kitakyushu and Fukuoka) and one group (Kobe and Osaka) applied. In May, 2004, the evaluation result for each port of the Super Nucleus Harbor Choice Committee was reported. And on July 23, Keihin Port (Tokyo and Yokohama), Isewan (Nagoya and Yokkaichi) and Hansin Port (Osaka and Kobe) were authorized in super nucleus harbor. Three ports authorized in super nucleus harbor were imposed on some topics such as 30% reduction of harbor cost, reduction of lead time, shortening of the customs/quarantine time and simplification of an administration procedure, etc. However, the problem of harbor cost reduction is not easy to consider even if I try to take up the subject of
labor costs. Another trend of Japanese ports is the practical use of ports as a general culture domain, as well as the issue of distribution. The first one is in relation to Shimonoseki Port and Pusan Port, and Shimonoseki Port takes Pusan Port into consideration to develop dose not concern a symbiosis theory in relation to sharks and suckfish. This development dose not concern of a uniform large port theory of a specially important harbor; and there is also matter of harbor administration, including a cultural area design. Port building become museums, as in the case of Sakai Port, and the port becomes an information center, regarding of an economic/cultural exchange in Tottori Prefecture.
The policies of Shimonoseki and Sakai are new trials to plan activation of a communities through ports an economic/cultural design. Super nucleus harbors accepting, ports lead to the
diametric opposition of Japanessharbor,in in the sense.

목차

Abstract

1. はじめに -戰後日本の社會動向-

2. ス一パ一中樞港灣構想

3. ス一パ一中樞港灣の敢り組みと今後の諜題 -京浜港の取り組みを前提に-

4. 日本海沿岸に港を有する都市の事例 -經濟文化圈の形成の基地を求めた港

5. おわりに一港灣機能の墨分けを前提に一

參考文獻

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-326-014554798