인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
One of the most famous answers to the question how to write history is to quote Ranke's argument that historians’ duty is “simply to show, how it really was.” His statement became a motto for historicism, the first model of history as a science. However, Ranke mentioned this on the basis of historical theology, which the ultimate purpose of understanding in history was to decode 'God's secret letters'. It is an irony that Ranke built the scientific model of history on the basis of historical theology that “every epoch is immediate to God.” From this paradox, ironical meanings of German historicism appeared since Ranke. This article explains the premises of historical theology which built the meta-history of Ranke's historicism first, and then analyses the possibility of rethinking Ranke's historicism from the perspective of our post-religious period.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Ⅰ. 왜 랑케인가?
- Ⅱ. 랑케의 메타역사로서 역사신학
- Ⅲ. 랑케와 독일 역사주의
- Ⅳ. 랑케 역사학의 현재적 의미
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-015235557