지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
From the 15th century onward Italy had been the center of the visual arts in Europe. In the 16th and 17th centuries this dominant position of Italian art was acknowledged not just by Italian writers but by the arttheoreticians of other European countries as well. So the artists and patrons in the Netherlands, for example, who regarded their own art as inferior, looked up to Italian art as artistic ideal.
However, this way of thinking arose as a result of approaching the north European art from Italian perspectives. Italian and Netherlandish arts came in contact with each other on the basis of commercial exchange as early as in the 15th century and their mutual relationship was since then developed into a complicated one. Thus, the visual arts of the two countries came to have various aspects in common and at the same time each posessed its own special artistic area in the 16th and 17th centuries.
In order to understand properly the mutual relationship between Italian and Netherlandish arts, we have in fact first of all to examine closely the characteristics of concrete interchanging activities which artists of the two countries carried out. Since this study of influences should be based on investigations on individual artists and groups of artists, it requires both extensive and accurate knowledge about the art of each country. And this has been one of the reasons why art historical research on this theme has been neglected until these days.
Hence, this paper is focused on 17th century Dutch landscape painting and on that of Jan van Goyen in particular to find out its characteristic nature, rather than superficially comparing 17th century landscapes of Italy and the Netherlands. The dunes and farmhouses of van Goyen show its own uniqueness and originality, utterly different from Italian art, so that, on the basis of Oguibe’s theory regarding colonialism, we can speak of multiple cultural centers, and not of one artistic center in 17th century Europe. Dutch landscape painting of van Goyen had, as is well known, its stylistical and iconographical origin in Flemish landscapes and was created in close connection with the political, economical, social and historical conditions of the Netherlands around 1600.
And it was not only the typical Dutch landscape painting but also the other category
of Dutch landscapes, which was highly appreciated by the rich and high social class of the Netherlands, i.e. the italianate landscapes, that was developed independently of Italian art. For the painters of italianate landscapes visited Rome with special interest in the beautiful scenery and warm sunlight in the suburbs of Rome, Campagna, and did not take part in the artistic developments in 17th century Rome. Besides this, the Italian landscape painting also went its own way. 17th century Roman Baroque landscape painting was namely not connected with the then much celebrated Netherlandish landscapes, but had its root in Venetian and Bolognese landscape traditions of Italy.
So Dutch and Italian landscape painting each had its own position and character in the 16th and 17th centuries. In the field of landscape painting which was regarded unimportant by the Italian painters and thus did not attract their attention, Dutch artists could create an original art free from the influence and coexisting with the art of Italians.
However, this way of thinking arose as a result of approaching the north European art from Italian perspectives. Italian and Netherlandish arts came in contact with each other on the basis of commercial exchange as early as in the 15th century and their mutual relationship was since then developed into a complicated one. Thus, the visual arts of the two countries came to have various aspects in common and at the same time each posessed its own special artistic area in the 16th and 17th centuries.
In order to understand properly the mutual relationship between Italian and Netherlandish arts, we have in fact first of all to examine closely the characteristics of concrete interchanging activities which artists of the two countries carried out. Since this study of influences should be based on investigations on individual artists and groups of artists, it requires both extensive and accurate knowledge about the art of each country. And this has been one of the reasons why art historical research on this theme has been neglected until these days.
Hence, this paper is focused on 17th century Dutch landscape painting and on that of Jan van Goyen in particular to find out its characteristic nature, rather than superficially comparing 17th century landscapes of Italy and the Netherlands. The dunes and farmhouses of van Goyen show its own uniqueness and originality, utterly different from Italian art, so that, on the basis of Oguibe’s theory regarding colonialism, we can speak of multiple cultural centers, and not of one artistic center in 17th century Europe. Dutch landscape painting of van Goyen had, as is well known, its stylistical and iconographical origin in Flemish landscapes and was created in close connection with the political, economical, social and historical conditions of the Netherlands around 1600.
And it was not only the typical Dutch landscape painting but also the other category
of Dutch landscapes, which was highly appreciated by the rich and high social class of the Netherlands, i.e. the italianate landscapes, that was developed independently of Italian art. For the painters of italianate landscapes visited Rome with special interest in the beautiful scenery and warm sunlight in the suburbs of Rome, Campagna, and did not take part in the artistic developments in 17th century Rome. Besides this, the Italian landscape painting also went its own way. 17th century Roman Baroque landscape painting was namely not connected with the then much celebrated Netherlandish landscapes, but had its root in Venetian and Bolognese landscape traditions of Italy.
So Dutch and Italian landscape painting each had its own position and character in the 16th and 17th centuries. In the field of landscape painting which was regarded unimportant by the Italian painters and thus did not attract their attention, Dutch artists could create an original art free from the influence and coexisting with the art of Italians.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 얀 판 호연(Jan van Goyen)의 1630년대 홀란드 풍경화
Ⅲ. 맺음말
문헌목록
Abstract
「이탈리아의 문화적 지배와 17세기 초의 홀란드 풍경화」에 대한 질의(홍진경)
홍진경 선생님의 질의에 대한 답변(이한순)
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
17세기 조선의 實景山水畵 연구
미술사연구
2004 .12
-
Landscape composition an 2
International Invitation Exhibition of Color Works
2015 .11
-
17-18세기 동아시아에서 實景山水畵의 성행과 그 의미
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2003 .03
-
17세기 네덜란드의 이탈리아풍 풍경화 - 밤보찬티(bamboccianti)를 중심으로 -
미술사연구
2004 .12
-
16세기 契會圖에 나타난 山水樣式의 변모
미술사학
2005 .08
-
[각론] 동아시아 회화사와 그림의 國籍 문제 : 高麗ㆍ朝鮮時代 傳稱 회화작품에 대한 재검토
미술사논단
2010 .06
-
A Landscape in Mind
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2019 .06
-
1949~1976년 中華人民共和國 山水畵에 보이는 정치적 표현
미술사연구
2009 .12
-
윌리엄 켄트의 정원에 나타난 풍경화적 속성
미술사논단
2007 .12
-
개인소장 《遊三釜落屛》 연구
미술사논단
2010 .12
-
국내 공공부문 주거단지의 경관계획 방법 분석 : 2000년대 수도권 지역에 건설된 공공부문 주거단지를 중심으로
한국실내디자인학회 논문집
2015 .12
-
Let Our Cities Become Beautiful : Connect macro-landscapes, mid-landscapes and micro-landscapes in the city together with the scientific method, to make cities orderly and charming with their own characteristics
한국디자인학회 학술발표대회 논문집
2013 .12
-
The World of Awe : Contemporary New-Media Art and Painting
서양미술사학회논문집
2013 .08
-
고려 후기 강남경 산수화의 대두와 이곽파화풍의 전개
미술사논단
2020 .06
-
마르크 샤갈의 회화적 표현기법을 활용한 바디페인팅의 ART in ART디자인
한국인체미용예술학회지
2014 .01
-
鄭敾의 ‘倣古參今’ : 조선 후기 倣古 산수화와 實景 산수화의 相補性
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2008 .03
-
Beautiful Landscape of Korea
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2019 .11
-
Beautiful Landscape of Korea
한국디자인학회 국제초대전도록
2019 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-609-017267912