지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Jojil Cheongja (low-grade celadons, 粗質靑磁) indicate the poor quality celadons which are originated in expansion of the demanding class and the process of division of product quality. They are begun in the end of the 10th to the early 11th centuries when earthen kilns are in the centre of ceramic industry. Low-grade celadons are not indicated specific celadons but amateurish products in quality. Low-grade celadons in Goryeo Dynasty era are divided into earthen ware related celadons and low-grade celadons in Gangjin and its near areas.
There are several kilns that succeed to good quality of early celadons produced in Gangjin Yongun-ri and Samheung-ri, furthermore, we can find the practical examples excavated from Haenam Sindeok-ri and Goheung Undae-ri. The pottery type produced in this area is simple in general and the main small pottery types are the same as celadons. However, middle-sized storing and carriage vessels are produced as earthen ware forms. Some parts of production method are utilized a sagger burning but main method is used up-piling burning that operated ceramic pillow. We could judge the possibility of primary burning optionally. The dating of these kilns is inferred as the early 11th to late 11th centuries due to haemurigubwan (parhelic-circle-based dish) in associated artefacts.
The Haenam Jinsan-ri group kilns and the Incheon Gyeongseo-dong kiln are the same level in moulding. Most of these kiln products show deeply low-grade patterns except the iron-painted celadon, moreover, they are also convinced same patterns that utilized up-piling method without primary burning or the sagger. The helpful information that we can guess their managemental date is the iron-painted celadon in Haenam Jinsan-ri. The iron-painted method is shown after parhelic-circle-based-dish. The material or expressing way of iron-painted design is found out the similarity as the Chinese iron-painted one developed in Cizhou-Yao (磁州窯) of Song Dynasty. Therefore, we can consider that Haenam Jinsan-ri or Incheon Gyeongseo-dong kilns had been managed with concentration between the later 11th century when Goryeo had normalisation of diplomatic relations with Song and regularized to import goods from Song and the earlier 12th century.
Daejeon Guwan-dong, Buan Jinseo-ri NO.18, Eumseong Saeng-ri kilns of low-grade celadons divided into Gangjin system are most similar to Gangjin Yongun-ri NO.10-Level 2 where are produced good quality celadon in productive types and celadon decorative techniques. The Yongun-ri NO.10-Level 2 kiln is particularly confirmed that it was managed at the height of celadon's prosperity since inlaid, incise, toehwa (堆花) and apchulyanggak (壓出陽刻) techniques in Yaozhou-Yao (耀州窯) kiln system are validated there. It is convinced that a lot of kilns found in the mid-inland are influenced the Gangjin system for they show almost all of Gangjin kiln techniques saved inlaid technique and sagger burning method. Especially lots of celadons are associated with the 11th to 12th century mintage in tumulus and the products in each area help to infer productive dates.
Until recent time, most low-grade celadons found in local areas are generally dated in the 11th century AD. However, these archaeological signs indicate that it is necessary to reconsider datings. To conclude, low-grade celadons are transformed much qualities in the process of productive division between in the end of 10th century and the early 11th century AD, in addition to this, they are expanded to local areas in 12th century AD of celadon's full glory and produced for various demanding classes.
There are several kilns that succeed to good quality of early celadons produced in Gangjin Yongun-ri and Samheung-ri, furthermore, we can find the practical examples excavated from Haenam Sindeok-ri and Goheung Undae-ri. The pottery type produced in this area is simple in general and the main small pottery types are the same as celadons. However, middle-sized storing and carriage vessels are produced as earthen ware forms. Some parts of production method are utilized a sagger burning but main method is used up-piling burning that operated ceramic pillow. We could judge the possibility of primary burning optionally. The dating of these kilns is inferred as the early 11th to late 11th centuries due to haemurigubwan (parhelic-circle-based dish) in associated artefacts.
The Haenam Jinsan-ri group kilns and the Incheon Gyeongseo-dong kiln are the same level in moulding. Most of these kiln products show deeply low-grade patterns except the iron-painted celadon, moreover, they are also convinced same patterns that utilized up-piling method without primary burning or the sagger. The helpful information that we can guess their managemental date is the iron-painted celadon in Haenam Jinsan-ri. The iron-painted method is shown after parhelic-circle-based-dish. The material or expressing way of iron-painted design is found out the similarity as the Chinese iron-painted one developed in Cizhou-Yao (磁州窯) of Song Dynasty. Therefore, we can consider that Haenam Jinsan-ri or Incheon Gyeongseo-dong kilns had been managed with concentration between the later 11th century when Goryeo had normalisation of diplomatic relations with Song and regularized to import goods from Song and the earlier 12th century.
Daejeon Guwan-dong, Buan Jinseo-ri NO.18, Eumseong Saeng-ri kilns of low-grade celadons divided into Gangjin system are most similar to Gangjin Yongun-ri NO.10-Level 2 where are produced good quality celadon in productive types and celadon decorative techniques. The Yongun-ri NO.10-Level 2 kiln is particularly confirmed that it was managed at the height of celadon's prosperity since inlaid, incise, toehwa (堆花) and apchulyanggak (壓出陽刻) techniques in Yaozhou-Yao (耀州窯) kiln system are validated there. It is convinced that a lot of kilns found in the mid-inland are influenced the Gangjin system for they show almost all of Gangjin kiln techniques saved inlaid technique and sagger burning method. Especially lots of celadons are associated with the 11th to 12th century mintage in tumulus and the products in each area help to infer productive dates.
Until recent time, most low-grade celadons found in local areas are generally dated in the 11th century AD. However, these archaeological signs indicate that it is necessary to reconsider datings. To conclude, low-grade celadons are transformed much qualities in the process of productive division between in the end of 10th century and the early 11th century AD, in addition to this, they are expanded to local areas in 12th century AD of celadon's full glory and produced for various demanding classes.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 조질청자의 여러 가지 계통
Ⅲ. 조질청자의 변화단계와 편년
Ⅳ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
高麗初期 靑磁生産體制의 變動과 그 背景
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2001 .12
-
扶安郡 柳川里 高麗陶磁 硏究
미술사논단
2007 .12
-
高麗靑磁에 보이는 金屬器皿의 影響
미술사연구
2009 .12
-
‘康津유형’의 공유 현상을 통해 본 11~12세기 청자의 성격
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2001 .09
-
始興 芳山洞 初期靑磁 窯址 出土品을 통해 본 中部地域 塼築窯의 運營時期
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2001 .03
-
韓國 初期靑磁의 形成과 傳播 : 塼築窯와 土築窯를 중심으로
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2003 .12
-
청자유약의 Color Spectrum구축을 위한 연구
한국색채학회논문집
2010 .08
-
14세기 康津 磁器所의 해체와 窯業 체제의 二元化
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2003 .09
-
漕運과 도자생산, 그리고 유통 : 海底引揚 고려도자를 중심으로
미술사연구
2008 .12
-
泰安 대섬 海底 出水 高麗靑磁의 양상과 제작시기 연구
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2013 .12
-
Afterimage from Goryeo celadon
International Invitation Exhibition of Color Works
2019 .12
-
高麗時代 鼎形靑瓷 硏究
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2006 .12
-
高敞郡 龍溪里窯와 “太平壬戌” 銘 瓦片 및 塼築窯 문제
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2004 .12
-
初期靑磁 編年問題 再論
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2006 .09
-
尙州 靑里 고분 출토 청자 편년 연구
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2000 .06
-
高麗 後期 靑瓷의 器形 變遷
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2001 .12
-
高麗陶磁窯址의 硏究
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
1986 .12
-
고려시대 청자화분 연구
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2019 .09
-
강진 청자소지의 제어와 색도 분석에 관한 연구
한국색채학회 학술대회
2009 .10
-
高麗中期壓出陽刻 靑瓷의 性格
미술사학연구(구 고고미술)
2004 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-650-017298261