메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
저널정보
한국법학회 법학연구 法學硏究 第17輯
오류 신고하기

피인용 1

검색

    초록·키워드

    The Roh Moo-hyun government, established after 2002 presidential election, legislated 'special law for admistrative capital construction' on the 29th of December in 2003 to solve congestion problem of metropolitan area of Seoul and achieve regional balanced development. The Roh government believed that population, industries, and political power has been severely concentratedon Metropolitan area of Seoul, national competitiveness has declined very seriously. To solve the abovementioned problems, the Roh government determined to construct administrative Capital in Chungchong Area. 'special law for admistrative capital construction"was designed and passed in National Assembly. But, 'A Procurator of constitutional petition for unconstitutionality of capital transfer' filed a suit on this 'special law'with constitutional petition for halting the activity of 'admistrative capital construction comittee'to constitutional court. So, constitutionality of construction of new administrative capital is supposed to be determined by constitutional court. 'A Procurator' are trying to halt the construction of new administrative capital and transfer of public organization with a logic that this process has been carried without people's consent and it could be unconstitutional, while they raise a question on the legal and administrative lawfulness, although construction of new administrative city is being done according to planned schedule.
    This paper examines the necessity and major contents of 'special law', and studies the constitutional petition judging system on legislation of national assembly. Analysis on whether special law violates the constitution from the viewpoint of legal formalities and contents will be followed.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기

      UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-360-017567893