지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Hongam Nacheol(弘巖 羅喆, 1863～1916) originated the Daejong-Gyo in 1909, which values the 'Dan-gun Hanbae-geom(=大皇祖; the Great King of the kings, Heaven's God) thought'. He is the one who proclaimed the ‘Manifestation of Dan-gun's lecture(檀君敎佈明書)'. His posthumous works made it possible to catch the fact that the name of the Dan-gun Hanbae-geom was put on record in about 45 synonyms, depending on the situation of the current age and history's change.
It was found this name was used in terms of Seonga, Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism and Koreanology etc, which is a very interesting phenomenon because it reflects the situation of those's times. Furthermore, the contemplation thought, current progress of contemplation, knowledge about the modern age and pedigree of Confucianism, Buddhism and Seonkyo(仙敎), which Nacheol ranged over, are expressed just as they are.
Something about the Manifestation of Dan-gun's lecture we should give notice is the nations re-enlightenment(重光) thought which is re-clarified in the view of spiritual and cultural history. The kernel of the content summarizes to eight theses: The ①Thought of a united world(世界一家) ② Incarnation of Hanbae-geom(大皇祖 聖肉身) ③Trinity thought(三神一體思想) ④Hanbae-geom Worship(大皇祖 崇拜) ⑤Top of religions as the Great Lecture and the Great Way(大敎大道) ⑥Dan-gun chronic(檀君祖實事) through the Tao pedigree(道淵源) ⑦Dan-gun's disciples(檀君聖賢) Worship(崇高思想鼓吹) ⑧Encouraging good and punishing evil(勸善懲惡). The focus is on discovering afresh his idea by comparing those theses with Nacheol's posthumous works.
His contemplation thought denotes the Sambeob suhaeng(=three methods of one's behavior pattern) and what he insisted on were the five principles (①敬奉天神, ②誠修靈性, ③愛合種族, ④靜求利福, ⑤勤務産業). Sambeob suhaeng denotes Jigam(止感; to stop feeling), Joshik(調息; to breathe evenly) and Keumchock(禁觸; to forbid touching). Jigam signifies the study of dismissing worldly thoughts from one's mind, while Keumchock denotes keeping away from miscellaneous affairs. Joshik is what makes these symmetric changes into one and again turns that one into naught. This may be a point that nobody covered up until now.
Nacheol claimed that it is a Mangbonbaewon(亡本背原; to forget and turn one's back to the origin) to forget the spiritual and cultural awareness of Hanbae-geom. The reason is that the people and mankind prosper only if the idea of Heaven's God comes to rise. Nacheol called upon changing the historical consciousness from the peninsula-historical aspect to the continent-historical aspect.
What he presents and what questions he leaves us today were observed in Nacheol's philosophy of life. This thesis analysed Nacheol's contemplation thought from a point of view of philosophy of religion and therefore recovered the significance in a new light, which is also a focus of this thesis. The part that remains uncovered, due to the lack of concrete materials, is a question we should solve in the very future.
It was found this name was used in terms of Seonga, Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism and Koreanology etc, which is a very interesting phenomenon because it reflects the situation of those's times. Furthermore, the contemplation thought, current progress of contemplation, knowledge about the modern age and pedigree of Confucianism, Buddhism and Seonkyo(仙敎), which Nacheol ranged over, are expressed just as they are.
Something about the Manifestation of Dan-gun's lecture we should give notice is the nations re-enlightenment(重光) thought which is re-clarified in the view of spiritual and cultural history. The kernel of the content summarizes to eight theses: The ①Thought of a united world(世界一家) ② Incarnation of Hanbae-geom(大皇祖 聖肉身) ③Trinity thought(三神一體思想) ④Hanbae-geom Worship(大皇祖 崇拜) ⑤Top of religions as the Great Lecture and the Great Way(大敎大道) ⑥Dan-gun chronic(檀君祖實事) through the Tao pedigree(道淵源) ⑦Dan-gun's disciples(檀君聖賢) Worship(崇高思想鼓吹) ⑧Encouraging good and punishing evil(勸善懲惡). The focus is on discovering afresh his idea by comparing those theses with Nacheol's posthumous works.
His contemplation thought denotes the Sambeob suhaeng(=three methods of one's behavior pattern) and what he insisted on were the five principles (①敬奉天神, ②誠修靈性, ③愛合種族, ④靜求利福, ⑤勤務産業). Sambeob suhaeng denotes Jigam(止感; to stop feeling), Joshik(調息; to breathe evenly) and Keumchock(禁觸; to forbid touching). Jigam signifies the study of dismissing worldly thoughts from one's mind, while Keumchock denotes keeping away from miscellaneous affairs. Joshik is what makes these symmetric changes into one and again turns that one into naught. This may be a point that nobody covered up until now.
Nacheol claimed that it is a Mangbonbaewon(亡本背原; to forget and turn one's back to the origin) to forget the spiritual and cultural awareness of Hanbae-geom. The reason is that the people and mankind prosper only if the idea of Heaven's God comes to rise. Nacheol called upon changing the historical consciousness from the peninsula-historical aspect to the continent-historical aspect.
What he presents and what questions he leaves us today were observed in Nacheol's philosophy of life. This thesis analysed Nacheol's contemplation thought from a point of view of philosophy of religion and therefore recovered the significance in a new light, which is also a focus of this thesis. The part that remains uncovered, due to the lack of concrete materials, is a question we should solve in the very future.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 단군 대황조(大皇祖) 사상의 연원과 발흥
Ⅲ. 단군교포명서(檀君敎佈明書)의 유래와 나철
Ⅳ. 삼법수행(三法修行)과 오대종지(五大宗旨)
Ⅴ. 결론
〈부록〉 단군교포명서(원문)
〈참고문헌〉
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
홍암 나철의 종교민족주의
한국학(구 정신문화연구)
2002 .09
-
弘巖 羅喆의 朝天과 遺書 硏究
역사와경계
2015 .09
-
대종교 설립초기 일제의 탄압과 대응 양상
仙道文化
2015 .01
-
‘나철 친필본’을 통해 본 나철 사상의 일면
공존의 인간학
2019 .08
-
수운 최제우와 홍암 나철의 영웅신화적 요소에 대한 비교연구
신종교연구
2014 .01
-
활동과 관상의 상호관계성 연구
장신논단
2007 .12
-
홍암(弘巖) 나철(羅喆)의 단군신앙운동 연구
종교연구
2008 .12
-
인검(寅劍)의 벽사(辟邪)원리와 기능에 관한 연구
한국민속학
2020 .05
-
Geom-an and Korean Society before and after the Twentieth Century
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2004 .03
-
근대 학설사 속의 ‘단군민족주의’
한국사상과 문화
2014 .01
-
근대사관 개념으로 분석한 檀君神話
경주사학
1991 .12
-
특집2:단군·단군신화·대단군 민족주의 단군에 대한 인식-고려에서 일제까지
역사비평
1992 .11
-
단군과 화랑의 세ㆍ한(3ㆍ1) 철학과 도의원리들
철학
1981 .05
-
一心三觀과 올바른 자기 정체성의 확립 - 『천태소지관』의 證果를 중심으로 -
불교문예연구
2020 .01
-
The Modern Korean Nation, Tan’gun, and Historical Memory in Late Nineteenth to Early Twentieth Century Korea
International Journal of Korean History
2014 .08
-
특집2:단군·단군신화·대단군 민족주의 단군신화, 어떻게 봐야 하나
역사비평
1992 .11
-
단군에 대한 연구의 역사
한국사 시민강좌
2000 .08
-
특집2:단군·단군신화·대단군 민족주의 대단군 민족주의의 전개와 양면성
역사비평
1992 .11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-017674347