메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
서울행정학회 한국사회와 행정연구 한국사회와 행정연구 제15권 제1호
발행연도
2004.5
수록면
405 - 433 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This work firstly aims to analyse the current state and the actual exercise of institute evaluation system which conducts the evaluation of both research results and management contents of the member research institutes under the three research councils in S&T sector, and then to discuss the policy alternations in order to sort out the problems found through this analysis. For this purpose, the 2002 evaluation exercise of the KOCI(the Korea Research Council for Industrial Science and Technology). one of the three research councils in S&T sector, was selected as a case study. The result shows that the KOCl's current evaluation system has a lot of deficits of system itself and problems of implementation process in most evaluation components. For this reason, it seems that this system will not properly realise the initial mission and function to upgrade the national innovation system for future knowledge-based society as well as to produce the world class research outputs of member research institutes. So, I discussed the developments of the institute evaluation system of the research councils in S& T sector in the four perspectives of evaluation purpose, evaluation resources, evaluation performance and evaluation utilisation, in order to make it contribute the development of both the national innovation system and public science and technology activities. These recommendations mainly contain the transfer of evaluation purpose from the management system of member institutes to their development direction and research results, the reduction and rearrangement of evaluation objects in accordance with the changed evaluation purpose, the expansion of the input of evaluation resources such as manpower, unit and information, the extension of evaluation intervals from one year to a longer period, the adoption of non ranking system among member institutes in the process of evaluation synthesis and the diversification of evaluation utilisation.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 연구분석틀의 설계
Ⅲ. 산업기술연구회의 기관평가 현황 분석
Ⅳ. 산업기술연구회의 기관평가 발전을 위한 정책대안 논의
Ⅴ. 맺음말
〈참고문헌〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-350-016528876