인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
For the more than last two decades, along with central planning and trade protection, industrial policy is supposed to be dead especially in those countries that have adopted the orthodox economic reform. The traditional debates on industrial policy have been too much focused on its tools or forms like directed credit at specific sectors, control of the entry and exit of firms, export targets, sector-ally differenciated tariff, tax & subsidy rates, and R&D subsidies and so on. However, when the nature of industrial policy is considered that they counteracts the allocative and distributive effects that the markets would otherwise produce(as argued by the theory of comparative advantage), we can argue that, contrary to popular impressions, almost all countries in reality have used and keep using industrial policy. As soon as a government "consciously" or "intentionally" favors some economic activities over others, it is in fact conducting industrial policy. Under the globalization, the most prominent example of industrial policy that is eagerly allowed by the orthodox and the IMP is offering incentives favorably to exports and foreign investment. The only difference is that they do not use the term of industrial policy. The reality itself can be a strong justifi￢cation for industrial policy.
Under the current capitalist market conditions, it cannot be presumed that the government has enough information ex ante for finding where the market failures calling for industrial policy exist or better information for industrial policy than the private sector. As a matter of facts, both of the government and the private sectors have imperfect knowledge and different information constrains. Not only the investment coordination among sectors but also informational coordination are still actual grounds for industrial policy. The recent challenges Korean economy is facing arise from its rapid internationalization and new demands for social policy. It may be a starting point for new industrial policy that the government and the private sectors share the information and constraints the other have while recognizing the relationship between their own objects based on the internationalization of business and the demands for social policy each.
Under the current capitalist market conditions, it cannot be presumed that the government has enough information ex ante for finding where the market failures calling for industrial policy exist or better information for industrial policy than the private sector. As a matter of facts, both of the government and the private sectors have imperfect knowledge and different information constrains. Not only the investment coordination among sectors but also informational coordination are still actual grounds for industrial policy. The recent challenges Korean economy is facing arise from its rapid internationalization and new demands for social policy. It may be a starting point for new industrial policy that the government and the private sectors share the information and constraints the other have while recognizing the relationship between their own objects based on the internationalization of business and the demands for social policy each.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-016588816
