지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The purpose of this study was to examine to what extent the basic physical fitness of students would be affected by a self- directed differentiated training program, which was projected for the systematic and synthetic development of the basic physical fitness and actually used for circulation exercise between warming up and main exercise in physical education class. The subject in this study were 220 first-grade girl students in middle school, who were divided into an 1l0-member experimental group and an 100-member control group. In data analysis, t-test was conducted and the level of significance was set at p＜.05. The findings of this study were as follows:
Before the experiment, there were no significant discrepancies between the experimental and control groups in every sporting event. However, the experiment brought evident changes to the two groups.
1) 50M Running Test
The experimental group's 50m running record shortened by 0.70 sec.(p＜.05), from 9.63 sec. in pretest to 8.93 sec. in posttest. That of the control group was reduced by 0.45 sec.(p＜.05), from 9.67 sec. to 9.22 sec. The experimental group made a 0.29 sec. more improvement than the control group(p＜.01) after the experiment.
2) Flexed Arm Hang Test
The experimental group's flexed arm hang record rised by 4.29 sec., from 8.93 sec. in pretest to 13.22 sec. in posttest. But the control group showed any significant changes. Therefore, the experimental group got better record by 3.44 sec.(p＜.001, compared to the control group.
3) Sit Up Test
The experimental group's sit up record increased by 5.89 times(p＜.01), from 21.19 times in pretest to 27.08 in posttest, whereas there was no significant difference in the control group. After the experiment, the experimental group made a better record by 5.76 times(p＜.001) than the control group.
4) Standing Broad Jumping Test
The experimental group's record rised by 20.28㎝(p＜.,001, from 140.28㎝ in pretest to 160.76㎝ in posttest, and the control group's record increased by 6.25㎝(p＜.01), from 141.02㎝ to 147.27㎝. The experimental group made more improvement by 13.40㎝(P＜.001).
5) Trunk Sit and Reach Flexion Test
The experimental group got a 3.16㎝ better record(p＜.05) in posttest, up to 17.21㎝ from 14.05㎝. But there was no significant change in the control group. Therefore, the experimental group made a 2.29㎝ better record(p＜.05), compared to the control group.
6) 1200M Running-Walking Test
The experimental group's record got shorter by 56 sec.(p＜.001), from 7'27" to 6'31." And the control group's record was reduced by 13 sec.(p＜.05), from 7''2B'' to 7'15". So, the experimental group attained a 44sec. better record(p＜.01) than the control group.
7) Class of Physical Fitness
The experimental group's class of physical fitness was upgraded by 0.36 class(p＜.001), from 2.93 to 2.57, and the control group improved by 0.20 class(p＜.05), from 2.95 to 2.75. The experimental group made more progress by 0.18 class(p＜.01).
As shown above, there was initially no significant gap between the two groups in every sporting event After the experiment, however, the experimental group that used the training program made significantly better record by p＜.05 or more in every event. Accordingly, the self-directed differentiated training program projected for the physical fitness enhancement actually served to facilitate the balanced development of the basic physical fitness of the students and eventually to develop their records.
Before the experiment, there were no significant discrepancies between the experimental and control groups in every sporting event. However, the experiment brought evident changes to the two groups.
1) 50M Running Test
The experimental group's 50m running record shortened by 0.70 sec.(p＜.05), from 9.63 sec. in pretest to 8.93 sec. in posttest. That of the control group was reduced by 0.45 sec.(p＜.05), from 9.67 sec. to 9.22 sec. The experimental group made a 0.29 sec. more improvement than the control group(p＜.01) after the experiment.
2) Flexed Arm Hang Test
The experimental group's flexed arm hang record rised by 4.29 sec., from 8.93 sec. in pretest to 13.22 sec. in posttest. But the control group showed any significant changes. Therefore, the experimental group got better record by 3.44 sec.(p＜.001, compared to the control group.
3) Sit Up Test
The experimental group's sit up record increased by 5.89 times(p＜.01), from 21.19 times in pretest to 27.08 in posttest, whereas there was no significant difference in the control group. After the experiment, the experimental group made a better record by 5.76 times(p＜.001) than the control group.
4) Standing Broad Jumping Test
The experimental group's record rised by 20.28㎝(p＜.,001, from 140.28㎝ in pretest to 160.76㎝ in posttest, and the control group's record increased by 6.25㎝(p＜.01), from 141.02㎝ to 147.27㎝. The experimental group made more improvement by 13.40㎝(P＜.001).
5) Trunk Sit and Reach Flexion Test
The experimental group got a 3.16㎝ better record(p＜.05) in posttest, up to 17.21㎝ from 14.05㎝. But there was no significant change in the control group. Therefore, the experimental group made a 2.29㎝ better record(p＜.05), compared to the control group.
6) 1200M Running-Walking Test
The experimental group's record got shorter by 56 sec.(p＜.001), from 7'27" to 6'31." And the control group's record was reduced by 13 sec.(p＜.05), from 7''2B'' to 7'15". So, the experimental group attained a 44sec. better record(p＜.01) than the control group.
7) Class of Physical Fitness
The experimental group's class of physical fitness was upgraded by 0.36 class(p＜.001), from 2.93 to 2.57, and the control group improved by 0.20 class(p＜.05), from 2.95 to 2.75. The experimental group made more progress by 0.18 class(p＜.01).
As shown above, there was initially no significant gap between the two groups in every sporting event After the experiment, however, the experimental group that used the training program made significantly better record by p＜.05 or more in every event. Accordingly, the self-directed differentiated training program projected for the physical fitness enhancement actually served to facilitate the balanced development of the basic physical fitness of the students and eventually to develop their records.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 연구방법
Ⅲ. 연구의 실천
Ⅳ. 기초체력 종목별 기록 분석 및 t-검증
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
기초군사훈련에 따른 사관생도의 체력향상과 체력검정제도 개선방안
운동과학
2010 .01
-
전통놀이 신체활동프로그램이 유아의 기초체력과 스트레스에 미치는 영향
한국체육과학회지
2010 .11
-
A study on directions for the development of a program for physical fitness classes for improving the physical strength of students with low-levels of physical fitness according to the PAPS (the Physical Activity Promotion System)
한국여성체육학회 학술세미나자료집
2014 .10
-
유아기 아동의 체력증진 방안
한국사회체육학회지
2003 .11
-
체력검정 기준의 성별 차이에 대한 문제: 공정성과 적합성 논의
한국스포츠학회
2019 .01
-
자기보고식 체력검사의 가능성 탐색
한국사회체육학회지
2016 .05
-
종합형 체력검사의 개발과 기능적 타당도 및 재현성 검증
한국체육과학회지
2010 .08
-
초등학생의 신체능력평가 컴퓨터 프로그램 개발
한국체육과학회지
2001 .08
-
지속적인 운동참여가 건강대사체력 및 전문기술체력에 미치는 영향
한국발육발달학회지
2017 .05
-
청소년 시기의 체력 요인별 발달 연구
한국체육과학회지
1996 .12
-
학생건강체력평가 프로그램(Physical Activity Promotion System)을 통한 비만도와 건강체력의 관계
한국초등체육학회지
2010 .01
-
한국 청소년과 일본 청소년의 체력 비교를 통한 문제점과 개선
한국체육과학회지
2008 .08
-
민속놀이 생활체육 프로그램 적용이 기초 체력 향상에 미치는 효과
한국체육과학회지
2000 .03
-
Physical activity, physical fitness, and Cognition in the elderly
한국발육발달학회지
2004 .09
-
유산소훈련모델 프로그램이 정신건강 및 기초체력향상에 미치는 영향
한국체육과학회지
2003 .08
-
초등학생의 체격발육을 고려한 체력평가 기준표 개발
한국발육발달학회지
2001 .06
-
유아의 행동체력에 미치는 체육 프로그램 효과
한국발육발달학회지
2010 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-692-016595578