지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Troilus and Cressida is such a satirical play that it has been awarded little attention until the twentieth century. Nowdays it is widely admired and regarded as an unique play in the Shakespearean canon.
The purpose of this paper is to examine the time metaphor which contributes so much to an understanding of the overall design of the play. The most remarkable aspect of time which appears in the division theme of this play is that of time as an agent of destroyer in the figure of personification. The personification is one of most obvious and explicit group of time metaphor in the play.
The first part of this paper will explore the theme of division which is so central to the play. Shakespeare seems to have separated two integral sides of human nature and set them at war with each other in this play with most diagrammatic system. The Trojans are chivalric and intuitive, believing in infinites of love and honour. The Greeks are realistic and self-centered, believing in the limitations as opposed to the Trojan values of magnanimity.
Time is personified friendly in Pandarus’ denial of responsibility for the outcome of Troilus’s love affair and Hector’s prediction of the war. The view of hostile time is most forcefully present in Ulysses’s long speech to Achilles. Here time is personified as a host. Night time is personified hostile in the parting scene where Troilus and Cressida are lamenting their first night together. The desturctive effects of time are caused by ‘oblivion monster’ which Ulysses uses associated with time’s faculty of ingratitude.
The purpose of this paper is to examine the time metaphor which contributes so much to an understanding of the overall design of the play. The most remarkable aspect of time which appears in the division theme of this play is that of time as an agent of destroyer in the figure of personification. The personification is one of most obvious and explicit group of time metaphor in the play.
The first part of this paper will explore the theme of division which is so central to the play. Shakespeare seems to have separated two integral sides of human nature and set them at war with each other in this play with most diagrammatic system. The Trojans are chivalric and intuitive, believing in infinites of love and honour. The Greeks are realistic and self-centered, believing in the limitations as opposed to the Trojan values of magnanimity.
Time is personified friendly in Pandarus’ denial of responsibility for the outcome of Troilus’s love affair and Hector’s prediction of the war. The view of hostile time is most forcefully present in Ulysses’s long speech to Achilles. Here time is personified as a host. Night time is personified hostile in the parting scene where Troilus and Cressida are lamenting their first night together. The desturctive effects of time are caused by ‘oblivion monster’ which Ulysses uses associated with time’s faculty of ingratitude.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Troilus and Cressida에 나타난 사랑
Shakespeare Review
1991 .06
-
Troilus and Cressida : 여성의 이중적 죽음
Shakespeare Review
1997 .06
-
"This is and is not Cressida" : Troilus And Cressida에 나타난 여성의 아이덴터티의 문제
Shakespeare Review
1995 .12
-
Troilus and Cressida 에 나타난 명예의 추구
Shakespeare Review
1995 .12
-
가치의 상대화, 언어적 단절, 정체성의 혼돈 : 『트로일러스와 크레시다』와 비극의 몰락
Shakespeare Review
2000 .09
-
Body Politics and Commerce of Desire in Troilus and Cressida
영미문학페미니즘
1998 .01
-
환멸의 희극적 수용 : 『트로일러스와 크레시더』(Troilus and Cressida)의 경우
신영어영문학
2002 .08
-
Troilus and Cressida : 황무지의 한계상황
Shakespeare Review
1994 .06
-
『트로일러스와 크레시다』 : 확실성과 절대성의 상실
Shakespeare Review
2008 .03
-
문제극의 문제 : 셰익스피어의 『트러일러스와 크레시다』 연구
신영어영문학
2001 .02
-
The "Naked" Antifeminist Text and Male Heroism: Cressida's Laugh in Shakespeare's Troilus and Cressida
영미문학페미니즘
1996 .01
-
"War and lechery confound all" : Troilus and Cressida 硏究
Shakespeare Review
1973 .04
-
Troilus and Cressida: 차이를 통한 위장(僞裝) : 대상관계 정신분석 이론을 중심으로
Shakespeare Review
1995 .06
-
『트로일러스와 크레시다』와 시간, 가치, 재현의 문제
영어영문학연구
2003 .01
-
Re-reading of Shakespeare’s Troilus and Cressida through Bill Brown’s ‘Thing Theory'
Shakespeare Review
2019 .06
-
“이것은 크레시더(Cressid)인 동시에 크레시더가 아니다” : 초서의 크리세이더(Criseyde)와 비교를 통하여
Shakespeare Review
2012 .12
-
드라이든의 셰익스피어 다시 쓰기 : 『트로일로스와 크레시다; 또는 너무 늦게 알려진 진실』을 중심으로
Shakespeare Review
2008 .06
-
트로일루스와 크리세이드 에 나타난사랑의 비가역성(非可逆性)
고전 르네상스 영문학
2005 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
『트로일러스와 크레시다』 : 확실성과 절대성의 상실
이용은
Shakespeare Review
2008
.03
문제극의 문제 : 셰익스피어의 『트러일러스와 크레시다』 연구
박윤희
신영어영문학
2001
.02
서구 모더니즘 관점에서 본 「쥬피타의 追放-이상의 영전에 바침」
오성록
,
심상욱
영어영문학
2016
.05
에드가 앨런 포우의 「윌리엄 윌슨」과 아쿠타가와 류우노스케의 「코」에 나타난 페르소나 비교 분석
김명희
동서비교문학저널
2005
.12
블레이크와 프로이트 : 성 본능과 억압의 원리를 중심으로
강옥선
현대정신분석
1999
.12
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-840-016411053