메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국보건복지학회 보건과 복지 보건과복지 제9집
발행연도
2007.12
수록면
69 - 87 (19page)
DOI
10.23948/kshw.2007.12.9.69

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study aims to claim that the right of choice is offered or judged not by social rehabilitation instructors or experts but residents in group hame and also offer basic materials that gives a guidance to improve a quality of residents' life by expanding social welfare service and opportunities of appropriate education for their need and strengthening their options for their independent lives.
For this study, I made up one-to-one questionnaire and postal questionnaire for hame helpers inhabiting in group homes from December in 2006 to January in 2007 and used 112 of 102 questionnaire for the purpose of research.
This study analyzes the result fran the degree of home helpers' interfering role according to the residents' right of choice and determination and the degree of their participation.
Through this study, as I expected from the purpose of the study, it is revealed that home helpers' role is focused on simply permanent protection for the mentally retarded. As a result, home helpers' interfering role can not help do a passive function as to have a great influence of the mentally retarded' living pattern and improve their the way of thought or living in small communities with their right of choice and determination. There is a lack of home helpers; professional knowledge to help the mentally retarded' daily lives. Therefore, to deal with their personal problems, the degree home helpers' interfering role takes up a great portion on the welfare service for the disabled.
In this concern, there should be prompt measure for the base of workers' profession and through the workers' profession and the efficient program for them. the quality of life for group home residents should be improved.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 조사방법
Ⅳ. 조사결과의 분석
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-338-001416224