인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
Buddhism attracts less attention than Confucianism because the religion is associated with unworldliness. The principle of escape from the mundane world and rejection of family ideology are two main bases for transcendence pursued by Buddhism. Such transcendence becomes a factor which contributes to incompatibility between Buddhist speculation or imagination and modernity. For this reason, Buddhism couldm't be an alternative to Confucianism in modern society characterized by the dissolution of order based on philosophy of the Chinese Song.
Buddhist speculations reflected in Han Yong Woon's poems may be defined as demonstrations of resistance. In his works, the poet created a self who sought to achieve modernity through resistance in the form of tradition. However, the self was not realized, but just wished to be as suggested in the existence of 'the beloved' as a character. The poet couldn't find a medium between modernity and Buddha. The source of poems by Seo Jeong Joo was his own culture. Therefore, his earlier works were not based on Buddhist imagination. In earlier days of writing poems, Seo Jeong Joo oriented towards the Western idea of modernity - deconstruction, introduced through Japan, rather than seeking towards tradition. His adaptation of Nitsche's aesthetic primitivism in writing poems tended to be superficial rather than be associated with reality. This led to the result that the poet accepted Asianism as the idea of colonialism without big conflict. In using Shilla(新羅) and Buddhism as poetic themes, the poet stood on a principle that aesthetic primitivism, the Western idea of modernity-deconstruction and orientalism were all equal. Traditional aspects found in his works written during the late period of Japanese colonial rule were regarded consistently corresponding to lay mysticism. For Seo Jeong Joo, Buddhist imagination was a system characterized by irresponsibility, transcendence and aesthetics that nullified worldly values and order. Cho Ji Hoon employed Buddhism from his own methodological view. Seeking both prosody and the discipline of meditation in his works, the poet tried to achieve peace by way of removing troubles on one hand and realize his own virtue on the other hand. Thus Cho Ji Hoon used Buddhism according to Confucianism-based idea of Eunil(隱逸).
Buddhist imagination presented in Korean modern poems had various aspects of ambivalence. This was closely related to such aspects of social conditions based on which the modern poems were formed. In colonial modern society where colonialism and modernity coexisted, tradition couldn't avoid bringing out various contexts of discourse. Han Yong Woon, Seo Jeong Joo and Cho Ji Hoon were different among them in ways of reforming the ambivalence of tradition in colonial modern society. Such ways become bases for understanding different relationships between aesthetics and world view.
Buddhist speculations reflected in Han Yong Woon's poems may be defined as demonstrations of resistance. In his works, the poet created a self who sought to achieve modernity through resistance in the form of tradition. However, the self was not realized, but just wished to be as suggested in the existence of 'the beloved' as a character. The poet couldn't find a medium between modernity and Buddha. The source of poems by Seo Jeong Joo was his own culture. Therefore, his earlier works were not based on Buddhist imagination. In earlier days of writing poems, Seo Jeong Joo oriented towards the Western idea of modernity - deconstruction, introduced through Japan, rather than seeking towards tradition. His adaptation of Nitsche's aesthetic primitivism in writing poems tended to be superficial rather than be associated with reality. This led to the result that the poet accepted Asianism as the idea of colonialism without big conflict. In using Shilla(新羅) and Buddhism as poetic themes, the poet stood on a principle that aesthetic primitivism, the Western idea of modernity-deconstruction and orientalism were all equal. Traditional aspects found in his works written during the late period of Japanese colonial rule were regarded consistently corresponding to lay mysticism. For Seo Jeong Joo, Buddhist imagination was a system characterized by irresponsibility, transcendence and aesthetics that nullified worldly values and order. Cho Ji Hoon employed Buddhism from his own methodological view. Seeking both prosody and the discipline of meditation in his works, the poet tried to achieve peace by way of removing troubles on one hand and realize his own virtue on the other hand. Thus Cho Ji Hoon used Buddhism according to Confucianism-based idea of Eunil(隱逸).
Buddhist imagination presented in Korean modern poems had various aspects of ambivalence. This was closely related to such aspects of social conditions based on which the modern poems were formed. In colonial modern society where colonialism and modernity coexisted, tradition couldn't avoid bringing out various contexts of discourse. Han Yong Woon, Seo Jeong Joo and Cho Ji Hoon were different among them in ways of reforming the ambivalence of tradition in colonial modern society. Such ways become bases for understanding different relationships between aesthetics and world view.
#불교
#식민성
#근대성
#양면성
#저항의 변증
#미학적 원시주의
#은일의지
#한용운
#서정주
#조지훈
#Buddhism
#Coloniality
#Modernity
#Ambibalence
#Dialectical resistance
#Aesthetic Primitivism
#Idea of Eunil
#Han Yong Woon
#Seo Jeong Joo
#Cho Ji Hoon
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- 1. 불교와 근대
- 2. 저항의 변증 - 萬海 韓龍雲
- 3. 세속적 신비주의-未堂 徐廷柱
- 4. 은일(隱逸)의 의지-지훈 조동탁
- 5. 근대시와 불교적 상상력의 양면성
- 참고문헌
- Abstract
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-811-014648440
