인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
Park Jae-ka (朴齊家, 1750-1805) and Lee Hee-kyung (李喜經, 1745-1805?) were the scholars of Northern Learning School. They proposed to enrich the nation and to secure the livelihood of people through the development of commerce and industry.
They had the same thoughts on Chosun vessels. Through the journey to China, they witnessed the wide expansion of Chinese ceramic use and technical development of ceramic manufacturing. And they acknowledged the superiority of Japanese to Chosun in technology and manufacturing system.
Comparing the technique of Chosun with the one of China and Japan, they pointed out problems of Chosun ceramic manufacturing technique and criticized the kiln operating system. They proposed an introduction of Chinese and Japanese techniques and technological policies.
To have a correct point of view on their proposals and severe criticisms, we have to consider some matters. First, they neither spoke for all of the Chosun consumers nor fairly represented the style and technique of Chosun porcelain. It is because not only the self-examination which resulted from the study of Chosun porcelain, but also their preference for the foreign ceramics, provided the momentum of the proposals and criticism.
Second, their technical records of Chosun porcelain were not free from mistakes because they didn't participate in making ceramics. We have to take into consideration what they pointed out; whether Chosun white clay, which is inferior to Chinese and Japanese clay on the whiteness and high fire resistance, is suitable to make ceramics similar to Chinese or Japanese ones: whether over-glaze decoration of porcelain was to our taste and Chinese style kiln was suitable to fire Chosun porcelain.
Next, they hardly paid attention to the aesthetics and styles of the Chosun porcelain. Generally speaking, how to view the vessels can be changeable depending on the viewers and times. But not only technique but also style have to be considered to appreciate the ceramics simultaneously. Even though the manufacturing technique of ceramics was underdeveloped, we could not underestimate themselves.
In spite of previous stated problems, their records have an art historical significance. Through them, we learned views of the Northern Learning School scholars on the contemporary Chosun, Chinese and Japanese ceramics and the technical problems of Chosun ceramics.
They had the same thoughts on Chosun vessels. Through the journey to China, they witnessed the wide expansion of Chinese ceramic use and technical development of ceramic manufacturing. And they acknowledged the superiority of Japanese to Chosun in technology and manufacturing system.
Comparing the technique of Chosun with the one of China and Japan, they pointed out problems of Chosun ceramic manufacturing technique and criticized the kiln operating system. They proposed an introduction of Chinese and Japanese techniques and technological policies.
To have a correct point of view on their proposals and severe criticisms, we have to consider some matters. First, they neither spoke for all of the Chosun consumers nor fairly represented the style and technique of Chosun porcelain. It is because not only the self-examination which resulted from the study of Chosun porcelain, but also their preference for the foreign ceramics, provided the momentum of the proposals and criticism.
Second, their technical records of Chosun porcelain were not free from mistakes because they didn't participate in making ceramics. We have to take into consideration what they pointed out; whether Chosun white clay, which is inferior to Chinese and Japanese clay on the whiteness and high fire resistance, is suitable to make ceramics similar to Chinese or Japanese ones: whether over-glaze decoration of porcelain was to our taste and Chinese style kiln was suitable to fire Chosun porcelain.
Next, they hardly paid attention to the aesthetics and styles of the Chosun porcelain. Generally speaking, how to view the vessels can be changeable depending on the viewers and times. But not only technique but also style have to be considered to appreciate the ceramics simultaneously. Even though the manufacturing technique of ceramics was underdeveloped, we could not underestimate themselves.
In spite of previous stated problems, their records have an art historical significance. Through them, we learned views of the Northern Learning School scholars on the contemporary Chosun, Chinese and Japanese ceramics and the technical problems of Chosun ceramics.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-609-014719139
