인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
The purpose of this study was to discuss the importance of the ethical behaviors, rating standards, and test-takers' rights in the context of English language testing. Test results should be understandable to test-takers. However, sometimes test-takers do not agree with the results. Since they have not been informed about or agreed with the test content, the testing process, test scoring criteria, testing policy, etc., they could have made unexpected results. The inadequate test results could be minimized by providing enough information about the nature of the test to test-takers in advance. Test-takers should have the right to access the information about the testing process as well. In addition, the analyses of several English language oral proficiency tests used in Korea such as TOP (Test of Oral Proficiency), SEPT (Simulated English Proficiency Test), G-TELP (General Test of English Language Proficiency) Speaking Test, indicate that unethical behaviors in language testing are related to the inadequate use of native speakers' standards in a Korean context. Based on this research, it is suggested that the ethics of English language testing should be reconsidered in a Korean context and test developers and English educators should put much effort on providing documentation for the rights and responsibilities of test-takers as well as standards.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-740-014917011
