메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국노어노문학회 노어노문학 노어노문학 제17권 제2호
발행연도
2005.8
수록면
27 - 48 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It is well known that so-called 'verbal noun', that is, a noun which is derived from a verb, contains both linguistic verbal features (aspect, voice) as well as noun features (gender, number, case). In this article, among these linguistic features I discuss the aspect, one of the major features of Slavic verbs associated with verbal nouns. This study gives a principled account of the more rarely discussed variations in Slavic aspect, differences in the effect of aspect on the derivation of verbal nouns (i. e. deverbal nouns ending in reflexes of Common Slavic *-nь?е and *-tь?е). The study has not only presented a detailed set of data including as east-west division in Slavic verbal nouns with regard to aspect but it has also offered a plausible explanation of the division. As the data show above, there is an east-west isogloss with regard to verbal nouns: in the western languages (Czech, Slovak, Polish), aspectual distinctions are preserved in verbal nouns to a very high degree, whereas in the eastern languages (Russian, Serbo-Croatian, Bulgarian) they do not preserve the aspectual semantics of their source verbs, and are generally only derived from imperfective verbs. In other words, the western languages regularly preserve verbal aspect as a semantic category in verbal nouns, while the eastern languages do not.
Given this difference, one is naturally inclined to ask why it should be the case, i. e., why the Slavic languages do not all behave in the same way concerning verbal nouns and aspect. This difference can be neatly explained if one assumes that the aspectually consistent use of perfective and imperfective verbal nouns in the western languages, as well as the very derivation of such aspectual pairs of verbal nouns, results from the general compatibility of the meaning of the western perfective, totality, with the temporally stable nature of nouns. The incompatibility of the temporal definiteness expressed by the perfective in the eastern languages with the temporally stable nature of nouns prohibits the widespread derivation of aspectual pairs of verbal nouns. Thus, it is possible to draw a linguistic isogloss between the western linguistic region (Czech, Slovak, Polish) and the eastern linguistic one (Russian, Serbo-Croatian, Bulgarian) when we deal with the relationship between Slavic verbal nouns and aspect.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 상의 일반적 개념
Ⅲ. 슬라브어에서의 상의 개념
Ⅳ. 서부 지역과 동부 지역 슬라브어의 동사적 명사형
Ⅴ. 동사적 명사의 종합적 분석
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-892-014915914