메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
저널정보
동북아시아문화학회 동북아 문화연구 동북아 문화연구 제14집
오류 신고하기

피인용 3

검색

    초록·키워드

    The aim of this treatise is in researching Social-Darwinism and Anarchism shared between the intellectuals in both Modern Korea and Japan, with Sin Chae-Ho and Kotoku Shusui as the central figure.
    Fundamentally speaking, Social-Darwinism originated with Spencer who applied the law of the survival of the fittest of Darwin's theory of evolution to society.
    Kotoku Shusui, a representative Socialist in Japan, accepted and applied Darwin's concept of struggle and selection for existence to his society in early 20th century. He thought evolution of society could realize the ideal of Socialism.
    Differently, Shin Chae-Ho's concept is more like that of Kato Hiroyuki or Lyangchi-chao, whose thought was based on organic conception of state, in aspect of his focus on nationalism or statism which was not accepted by Kotoku.
    When Social-Darwinism became the base theory for Japan Imperialism, Anti-Imperialism got formed in East Asia.
    Anarchism in Japan took shape on a full scale from Kotoku's 'Direct act' code in 1906.
    He was considered to notice desperately laborers' fall by necessity from industrial capital after Japan's Industrial Revolution followed by Russo-Japanese Wars. He insisted that the laborers should attain their rights and interests in the form of 'Direct Act', denying parliamentarism by a few elites after his visit in USA. Aanarcho-Syndicalism was originated from this and soon became the mainstream in Anarchism of Japan.
    On the contrary, in Korea, terrorism became the most important action in Anarchism.
    Shin Chae-Ho cried out for the people's revolution against Japan's imperialism without reference to his state or people in his 'Declaration for Cho-sun revolution' (1923).
    He also insisted on Korea's liberation and building ideal Cho-sun. He justified terror or violent revolution in the way of achieving people's revolution.
    In this aspect, it can be said that Shin was affected from Kotoku's concepts of 'Direct action', thought of assassination, or Social-revolution. But Shin was more radical Anarchist and the reason was Japan's violent occupation on Korea.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기

      UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-910-014958170