지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2008.4
- 수록면
- 193 - 196 (4page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since Balhae sent envoys to Japan, two countries had had close diplomatic relations. Balhae having diplomatic relations with Tang sent envoys biyearly or once in three years from the end of the 8th century to the beginning of the 9th century.
In this paper, I will research two things. First, why did Balhae often send envoys to Japan in the beginning of the 9th century? There seems economic reason though, I will investigate the reason specifically in the perspective of the international circumstances. Second, Balhae has not sent any envoy since 827. Why didn't Balhae send envoys Japan? Was not related to Jangbogo's engagement in trade with Japan?
Through the 8th century, Shilla had diplomatic relations with Japan even though there are some conflicts between two countries. But the diplomatic tie was broken because Shilla did not send any envoy after 779. Kim Namson was the last envoy. To take an advantage of this, Balhae tried to win the diplomatic relations with Japan. We cannot say that frequent visiting of Balhae's envoys to Japan had no relations with Japan's diplomatic break with Shilla.
Envoys from Balhae engaged in trade with Japan. A high official, Hujiwarano Otsgu insisted Balae envoys' return to Balhae, arguing that Balhae envoys were just like a merchant so that Japan had a financial problem caused by their activities in Japan. Although Japan let Ko Jungtae go back to Balhae in 823, Japan allowed other envoys to stay in Japan after then. There was an economic reason to accept Balhae's envoy. Japan had much interests in trade items brought by Balhae envoys.
However, Balhae's envoy did not come to Japan during a period of 827 to Jangbogo's death in 841. It was not unrelated to Jangbogo's engagement in trade with Kyushu in Japan. Japan should give return presents to Balhae envoys in the name of grant. It was a financial burden to Japan. Therefore, it was more lucrative to Japan to engage in a private trade with Jangbogo holding a complete power in the international trade among Japan, China, and Shilla. From 827, Balhae could not send envoys to Japan.
However, since Jangbogo's assassination in 841, the circumstances have changed. Faced out East Asian trade chaos caused by Jangbogo's death, Japan needed a trade route for Tang. This was an opportunity for Balhae so as to send envoys to Japan in 841.
In this paper, I will research two things. First, why did Balhae often send envoys to Japan in the beginning of the 9th century? There seems economic reason though, I will investigate the reason specifically in the perspective of the international circumstances. Second, Balhae has not sent any envoy since 827. Why didn't Balhae send envoys Japan? Was not related to Jangbogo's engagement in trade with Japan?
Through the 8th century, Shilla had diplomatic relations with Japan even though there are some conflicts between two countries. But the diplomatic tie was broken because Shilla did not send any envoy after 779. Kim Namson was the last envoy. To take an advantage of this, Balhae tried to win the diplomatic relations with Japan. We cannot say that frequent visiting of Balhae's envoys to Japan had no relations with Japan's diplomatic break with Shilla.
Envoys from Balhae engaged in trade with Japan. A high official, Hujiwarano Otsgu insisted Balae envoys' return to Balhae, arguing that Balhae envoys were just like a merchant so that Japan had a financial problem caused by their activities in Japan. Although Japan let Ko Jungtae go back to Balhae in 823, Japan allowed other envoys to stay in Japan after then. There was an economic reason to accept Balhae's envoy. Japan had much interests in trade items brought by Balhae envoys.
However, Balhae's envoy did not come to Japan during a period of 827 to Jangbogo's death in 841. It was not unrelated to Jangbogo's engagement in trade with Kyushu in Japan. Japan should give return presents to Balhae envoys in the name of grant. It was a financial burden to Japan. Therefore, it was more lucrative to Japan to engage in a private trade with Jangbogo holding a complete power in the international trade among Japan, China, and Shilla. From 827, Balhae could not send envoys to Japan.
However, since Jangbogo's assassination in 841, the circumstances have changed. Faced out East Asian trade chaos caused by Jangbogo's death, Japan needed a trade route for Tang. This was an opportunity for Balhae so as to send envoys to Japan in 841.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 발해사절의 來日
3. 장보고의 대일교역과 발해 공적사절의 도절
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
일본 중등학교 역사교과서의 발해 관련 내용 연구
사회과교육
2002 .06
-
Political Change in Japan and Korea-Japan Relations
국제정치논총
1985 .12
-
고고학 자료로 본 발해와 위구르 제국 ― 콕샤로프카-8 유적을 중심으로 ―
중앙아시아연구
2017 .01
-
건륭연간 외교 공간의 확장과 조선 사신의 교류 -조선·청 지식 교류의 기반에 관하여-
한국학논총
2019 .01
-
19세기 말 메이지 일본 신문에 드러난 조선 사절단의 모습
동북아 문화연구
2018 .12
-
일본의 정보화 : e-Japan과 u-Japan 전략을 중심으로
아시아연구
2006 .03
-
김정은 정권의 대일 접근과 북일관계
국제정치연구
2016 .12
-
US-Japan-Korea Co-operation : Where Next?
Global Asia
2017 .03
-
일본의 對동아시아 통상정책 변화와 추진방향에 관한 고찰
무역연구
2009 .01
-
郁達夫의 일본체험
일본근대학연구
2011 .01
-
韓ㆍ日關係의 問題點
국제정치논총
1964 .05
-
韓国人ニューカマーのライフヒストリー ―儒教の影響-
차세대 인문사회연구
2012 .01
-
대일무역에서 소재 및 부품산업의 경쟁력 실태에관한 실증분석
무역연구
2013 .01
-
1763年 對日通信使船의 建造
해운물류연구
2004 .01
-
일본의 정보화와 e-Japan 전략
국제정치연구
2001 .12
-
東アジア安保秩序の変化と日 · 韓安保協力
동북아 문화연구
2013 .03
-
Issues and National Images in Korea-Japan Relations
아세아연구
1978 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0