메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
새한영어영문학회 새한영어영문학 새한영어영문학 제48권 제3호
발행연도
2006.8
수록면
199 - 216 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Given that little attention has been paid to the syntactic aspects of Causative Verb Complements (CVCs) in English, this paper aims to examine various syntactic phenomena of such CVCs from a generative perspective. In particular, it lays focus on their constituency, category, and case valuation of their DP subjects.
It has been claimed that the CVC of [DP, VP] is a single unit and the DP is the subject of the CVC. Supporting evidence for this claim comes from many syntactic facts: coordination facts, binding phenomena, the behaviors of subject-oriented idioms and adjuncts, the occurrence of expletives, facts about the floating emphatic reflexive, not-initial DPs, and alone-final DPs.
After arguing against previous CP and VP analyses of the CVC, I have proposed that CVCs are clausal constituents with the category of TP whose head T is defective, laking ∮ -complete in the sense of minimalist syntax. With respect to the case valuation of the CVC subject, it has been stressed that the overt subject is an active Goal but cannot be valued by the T<SUB>def</SUB> of the CVC under Chomsky's (1995, 2000, 2001, 2005) Agree Theory. Then, the subject has been said to agree with the matrix light verb v and receive an accusative case value, as in typical ECM constructions.

목차

Ⅰ. Introduction
Ⅱ. CVCs as Single Constituents
Ⅲ. CVCs and TPs
Ⅳ. The Structure of CVCs and Case Valuation of Their DP Subjects
Ⅴ. Summary
Works Cited
Abstract

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0