지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2005.11
- 수록면
- 7 - 43 (37page)
- DOI
- 10.17068/lhc.2005.11.8.2.7
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Korean archaeological circles has regarded a bronze mirror as a critical status symbol during the Bronze and Iron Ages in the Korean Peninsula. Bronze mirrors have been also considered as a standard of chronometric dating of the archaeological sites yielding them because the types of the bronze mirrors well reflect temporal shift. In particular, Chinese mirrors are one of the artifacts well reflecting international relationships among China, Korea, and Japan at that time. In the Korean Peninsula, mirrors imitating Chinese mirrors began to appear before and after the Christian era. While these mirrors imitating Chinese mirrors have been reported mostly in Gyeongsang provinces, a couple of bronze mirrors imitating Chinese mirrors were unearthed at Su-dong pit burial site in Yeonggwang along with a bronze implement with bird design. The discovery of the mirrors provided Korean archaeological circle a critical momentum in that they were bronze mirrors firstly reported in the Honam Region which provided an opportunity to study socio-political stratification or differentiation and international relationships at that time.
While it was impossible to trace the original mirrors which two mirrors attempted to imitate, they were considered to be locally manufactured. Triple slender saw-tooth pattern design on the mirror “a” is considered to reflect knobbed mirror tradition of the former period. While the mirror “a” and mirror “b” represented characteristicsof the imitative bronze mirrors of the South and North Gyeongsang provinces, respectively. The fact that these two mirrors were furnished in a burial reflected furnishing tradition of the knobbed mirrors of the former period. Based on the bronze implements with bird design and two mirrors, the person buried in the pit burial might have a position related to ritual service rite. Along with the bronze implements with bird design, these two mirrors might be implements for the ritual service. While the person buried in the burial seemed to recognize the meaning of the Chinese mirror as a status symbol to symbolize authority, he did not have access to original Chinese mirrors. Instead, he manufactured and possessed imitative bronze mirrors for justifying his authority. While clear archaeological evidence to show direct trade or exchange with the Chinese Han Dynasty was not produced at the Su-dong site, these two bronze mirrors imitating Chinese mirrors are sound evidence that population at the Su-dong site already acknowledged the Chinese Han culture and there might be international trade or exchange with China, in particular, Nangnang commandery. Based on the typology of the bronze implements, the date of the site is belonging between the late 1st centure and the early 2nd century A.D..
While it was impossible to trace the original mirrors which two mirrors attempted to imitate, they were considered to be locally manufactured. Triple slender saw-tooth pattern design on the mirror “a” is considered to reflect knobbed mirror tradition of the former period. While the mirror “a” and mirror “b” represented characteristicsof the imitative bronze mirrors of the South and North Gyeongsang provinces, respectively. The fact that these two mirrors were furnished in a burial reflected furnishing tradition of the knobbed mirrors of the former period. Based on the bronze implements with bird design and two mirrors, the person buried in the pit burial might have a position related to ritual service rite. Along with the bronze implements with bird design, these two mirrors might be implements for the ritual service. While the person buried in the burial seemed to recognize the meaning of the Chinese mirror as a status symbol to symbolize authority, he did not have access to original Chinese mirrors. Instead, he manufactured and possessed imitative bronze mirrors for justifying his authority. While clear archaeological evidence to show direct trade or exchange with the Chinese Han Dynasty was not produced at the Su-dong site, these two bronze mirrors imitating Chinese mirrors are sound evidence that population at the Su-dong site already acknowledged the Chinese Han culture and there might be international trade or exchange with China, in particular, Nangnang commandery. Based on the typology of the bronze implements, the date of the site is belonging between the late 1st centure and the early 2nd century A.D..
목차
1. 머리말
2. 遺構와 出土遺物
3. 水洞鏡의 檢討와 被葬者의 性格
4. 맺음말
參考文獻
(Abstract)
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Bronze Mirror
Korea Journal
1986 .01
-
The Mirror
Korea Journal
1976 .07
-
초기 동경의 기능과 확산과정에 대한 연구
고조선단군학
2008 .05
-
기원전 10∼8세기 遼寧地域의 銅鏡 유형과 多鈕鏡의 출현
고조선단군학
2015 .06
-
오정희 소설에 나타난 거울 이미지 연구
비평문학
2010 .09
-
한반도 출토 동경(銅鏡) 연구사
울산사학
2014 .12
-
고려인의 동경인식
울산사학
2015 .12
-
현대시 교육에서의 시인론의 향방 : 이상(李箱)의 『거울』을 중심으로
어문학
2016 .06
-
고려시대 쌍룡문경(雙龍紋鏡) 유입(流入)과독자성(獨自性)
헤리티지:역사와 과학
2019 .01
-
신라의 鍮石 인식과 그 특징
한국고대사연구
2019 .12
-
안드레이 타르코프스키 영화 속의 거울 이미지
스토리앤이미지텔링
2012 .09
-
Sijo : The Mirror of the Heart
Korea Journal
1976 .02
-
유라시아 서부지역 인물문양 동양계 동경 검토
석당논총
2019 .01
-
고조선 국가의 형성과 고조선 금속문화
고조선단군학
2009 .11
-
Bronze Age in Korea
Korea Journal
1984 .09
-
金文學 著書 書評 考察
중국문화연구
2017 .05
-
A Burnt-out Case에 나타난 Mirror Image로서 등장인물의 역할
새한영어영문학
1996 .10
-
<<治平要覽>>에 수록된 <<唐鑑>>의 史論과 <<帝範>>
중국사연구
2019 .01
-
Bronze Age Culture in Korea
Korea Journal
1974 .04
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0