지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2004.11
- 수록면
- 273 - 306 (34page)
- DOI
- 10.17068/lhc.2004.11.7.2.273
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In the last 60 years, Korean archaeology has largely developed externally. But the method and theory in Korean archaeology was not discussed to any extent internally. In this article, the following problems of the direction of studies in the Korean archaeology are discussed,
Firstly, I considered the concept, the purpose, and the identity of archaeology. The concept and the purpose of archaeology have changed as the archaeology has developed. The first role of archaeology was to describe past cultures, but currently it is to explain them. And it was considered the purpose of Korean archaeology. One of the purpose of Korean archaeology is to reconstruct past culture through material remains which is same with general purpose. In addition to this, they are to study the origin and unique creation of Korean culture and to study the territory of Korea and the relationship with the foreign culture. Archaeology now does not belong to history or anthropology, but archaeology is archaeology itself.
Secondly, some problems such as process of study, basic assumptions, and philosophical discussion are considered. One of the basic assumptions is that all types of human behaviors left material remains, others are the evolutional thinking as materials’ progress and the concept of uniformitarianism came from geology. The philosophical discussion in archaeology improved the level of explanation on the past culture, and reached almost same level with other disciplines.
Lastly, I considered the direction of the studies in Korean archaeology on aspects of studies and reality. In aspects of studies, It was considered the establishment of the system in archaeological studies and the enlargement of subfield in archaeology. Specially understanding of archaeological studies and discussions about method and theory of archaeology are more needed. In aspects of reality, it was considered some subjects such as the role of institutions, conservation of sites, management of museums, and public archaeology. The cooperation between archaeological institutions and the participation to public activities should be needed.
Until now, I think that Korean archaeology did not get out of the traditional archaeology. Therefore, It is more prudent ways to improve constantly the method and theory needed in Korean archaeology rather than to follow recklessly the trend of world archaeology.
Firstly, I considered the concept, the purpose, and the identity of archaeology. The concept and the purpose of archaeology have changed as the archaeology has developed. The first role of archaeology was to describe past cultures, but currently it is to explain them. And it was considered the purpose of Korean archaeology. One of the purpose of Korean archaeology is to reconstruct past culture through material remains which is same with general purpose. In addition to this, they are to study the origin and unique creation of Korean culture and to study the territory of Korea and the relationship with the foreign culture. Archaeology now does not belong to history or anthropology, but archaeology is archaeology itself.
Secondly, some problems such as process of study, basic assumptions, and philosophical discussion are considered. One of the basic assumptions is that all types of human behaviors left material remains, others are the evolutional thinking as materials’ progress and the concept of uniformitarianism came from geology. The philosophical discussion in archaeology improved the level of explanation on the past culture, and reached almost same level with other disciplines.
Lastly, I considered the direction of the studies in Korean archaeology on aspects of studies and reality. In aspects of studies, It was considered the establishment of the system in archaeological studies and the enlargement of subfield in archaeology. Specially understanding of archaeological studies and discussions about method and theory of archaeology are more needed. In aspects of reality, it was considered some subjects such as the role of institutions, conservation of sites, management of museums, and public archaeology. The cooperation between archaeological institutions and the participation to public activities should be needed.
Until now, I think that Korean archaeology did not get out of the traditional archaeology. Therefore, It is more prudent ways to improve constantly the method and theory needed in Korean archaeology rather than to follow recklessly the trend of world archaeology.
목차
1. 머리말
2. 고고학이란 어떠한 학문인가?
3. 고고학연구의 기본틀
4. 한국고고학의 연구방향
5. 맺음말
참고문헌
(Abstract)
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Korean Archaeology Today
Korea Journal
1981 .09
-
고고학 해석의 지평 넓히기 – ‘고고학 자료’에 대한 다양한 인식 검토 –
인문논총
2012 .01
-
한국고고학의 신자료 일이
동아문화
1964 .10
-
중국고고학의 현상
동아문화
1978 .12
-
연구 주제 다변화의 모색 : 2010~11년 역사고고학 연구의 동향
역사학보
2012 .09
-
Archaeology and our old Testament Contemporaries
신학지남
1967 .12
-
Possible Limits to Reconstruction of a Culture : Some Reflections on Archaeology
Korea Journal
1974 .10
-
역사고고학 연구의 동향
역사학보
2008 .09
-
성서와고고학 (ARCHAEOLOGY AND THE BIBLE)
신학지남
1932 .03
-
[Guest Editor’s Introduction] Recent Approaches in Korean Archaeology
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2009 .06
-
1990년대 이후의 한국 구석기고고학 연구성과
헤리티지:역사와 과학
2002 .01
-
Current Archaeology in North-Korea and Prospects for Academic Exchange with South Korea
Korea Journal
1991 .03
-
한국 고고학의 발전1
동아문화
1982 .12
-
考古學
역사학보
1990 .12
-
考古學
역사학보
1993 .12
-
考古學
역사학보
1996 .12
-
考古學
역사학보
1984 .12
-
考古學
역사학보
1987 .12
-
중국 중세 고고학 성과의 집대성 中國社會科學院考古硏究所 編著, 中國考古學· 三國兩晉南北朝卷(北京: 中國社會科學出版社 2018)
중앙고고연구
2019 .01
-
New Perspectives in the Study of Production and Exchange in Korean Archaeology
THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES
2009 .06
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0