지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
This study focuses on the date and the social background of the publication of Gusamguksa, the first historical book written in the Goryeo(高麗) period on the three kingdoms. In the Japji(miscellaneous, 雜志) section of Samguksagi(history of the three kingdoms, 『三國史記』) appears a description of a government organization called Taebong(泰封). However, when mentioning the term Taebong in Samguksagi, similar government organizations or names of titles from Goryeo also appear, juxtaposed to the term Taebong. It is noteworthy that among the organizational names mentioned, some of them are known to have been nonexistent during the Injong(仁宗) period then Samguksagi was published. This indicates that the editors for Samguksagi, when writing about Taebong, did not write offhand but referred to another historical source. There were many historical sources available for reference when Samguksagi was published. However, the only publication which dealt specifically with the history of the three kingdoms was Gusamguksa. Therefore, if the mentioning of Taebong owes its origin to another historical source material, the only possibility is that it referred to Gusamguksa. This leads to the hypothesis that the period when the title mentioned next to Taebong actually existed was the time Gusamguksa was published.
What can be learned from an analysis of the description of Taebong in Samguksagi is that the period when the juxtaposed title in question existed is approximately from the second year of Mokjong(穆宗) to the second year of Hyeonjong's(顯宗) reign. Thus the date of publication of Gusamguksa is assumed to have been around the same period. However, the period from the second year of Mokjong to the second year of Hyeonjong's reign is that of a political uproar, featured with the empowerment and insurrection of Gimchiyang(金致陽) and the coup by Gangjo(康兆). The social atmosphere at the time was far from being appropriate for publishing an important history book. This naturally leads one to presume that the publication date for Gusamguksa is probably sometime after the second year of Hyeonjong, more specifically, during the fourth year of Hyeonjong's rule, when the war with Khitan was over and the board of editors, including Gamsuguksa, was newly appointed.
The social backdrop for the publication of Gusamguksa during the fourth year of Hyeonjong's rule is characterized by the reenforcement of national security and the reorganization of the governmental system. Such reform was necessary for the king, but worked as a financial burden on the people, who have already been much devastated by the war. Thus the rulers aimed to instill into the minds of the people the importance of national security against the Khitan, and to accomplish this a sense of a historical continuity of Goryeo with Goguryeo(高句麗), which have been giving much support to the Goryeo society both internally and externally, needed to be established systematically. The publication of Gusamguksa, which is essentially a history of the three kingdoms mainly from the Goguryeo's point of view, was only one of the ways to accomplish this task.
What can be learned from an analysis of the description of Taebong in Samguksagi is that the period when the juxtaposed title in question existed is approximately from the second year of Mokjong(穆宗) to the second year of Hyeonjong's(顯宗) reign. Thus the date of publication of Gusamguksa is assumed to have been around the same period. However, the period from the second year of Mokjong to the second year of Hyeonjong's reign is that of a political uproar, featured with the empowerment and insurrection of Gimchiyang(金致陽) and the coup by Gangjo(康兆). The social atmosphere at the time was far from being appropriate for publishing an important history book. This naturally leads one to presume that the publication date for Gusamguksa is probably sometime after the second year of Hyeonjong, more specifically, during the fourth year of Hyeonjong's rule, when the war with Khitan was over and the board of editors, including Gamsuguksa, was newly appointed.
The social backdrop for the publication of Gusamguksa during the fourth year of Hyeonjong's rule is characterized by the reenforcement of national security and the reorganization of the governmental system. Such reform was necessary for the king, but worked as a financial burden on the people, who have already been much devastated by the war. Thus the rulers aimed to instill into the minds of the people the importance of national security against the Khitan, and to accomplish this a sense of a historical continuity of Goryeo with Goguryeo(高句麗), which have been giving much support to the Goryeo society both internally and externally, needed to be established systematically. The publication of Gusamguksa, which is essentially a history of the three kingdoms mainly from the Goguryeo's point of view, was only one of the ways to accomplish this task.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 『舊三國史』 편찬시기에 대한 기존 연구 검토
Ⅲ. 『舊三國史』 泰封 官制를 통해서 본 『舊三國史』의 편찬시기
Ⅳ. 『舊三國史』의 편찬배경
Ⅴ. 결론
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
고구려와 고려의 역사적 계승 관계
한국고대사연구
2004 .03
-
徐熙(942~998)의 외교담판에 담긴 의미와 그 영향 : 현대 韓中關係에 가로놓인 ‘歷史論爭'의 극복과 관련하여
민족문화
2012 .06
-
고구려 붕괴 후 그 유민의 거취 문제
한국고대사연구
2004 .03
-
고려·거란 ‘30년 전쟁’과 동아시아 국제질서
동북아역사논총
2011 .12
-
고려중기 고구려계승의식의 변화와 ‘句高麗’
역사와실학
2020 .08
-
中國 正史 속의 高句麗-중국의 고구려 귀속 논리에 대한 문헌사적 검토-
고조선단군학
2004 .06
-
993년 고려−거란 간 갈등 및 여진 문제
역사와현실
2012 .09
-
韓ㆍ中 記錄에 나타난 高句麗의 正統性과 그 意味 : 建國始祖神話와 民俗을 중심으로
동아인문학
2004 .12
-
고려 현종대 거란과의 전쟁과 군사제도 정비
역사와 담론
2017 .04
-
10~12세기 하생신사(賀生辰使) 파견과 고려-거란 관계
역사와현실
2013 .09
-
고려 외교에서 의례(儀禮)와 국왕의 자세
역사와현실
2014 .12
-
해방직후 고려 국호론의 전개와 고려 표상
역사와현실
2018 .09
-
충주고구려비를 통해 본 5세기 중반 고구려와 신라와의 관계
고구려발해연구
2019 .11
-
[고려] ‘인간의 삶’에 대한 다양한 관심, 그리고 무관심 : 2011년∼2012년 고려시대사 연구 동향
역사학보
2013 .09
-
고려 전기 외교의례에서 국왕 ‘서면(西面)’의 의미
역사와현실
2015 .12
-
고구려 생활문화사 연구론
역사와현실
2012 .03
-
주몽고려, 궁예고려, 왕건고려, 코리아의 단절과 계승
역사와현실
2018 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0