지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Privatization of governmental functions and the widespread use of contract tool are global trend of our days. In analysing these public contracts related to privatization of governmental functions, it is important to balance between “efficiency of public administration” and “democratic-legal control to these contracts”.
The term “PPP (Public Private Partnership) contracts” can be applied in two dimensions. In narrow meaning, they refer to contracts only related to PFI (Private Finance Initiative). In a broad sense, they mean contracts related to cooperation between public and private institutions. Contracting-out can be included in the latter meaning of PPP contract.
PPP contract in a narrow sense is characterized by long-term, economic risk transfer to private sector, and therefore mutual trust between public and private institutions is especially important. Considering these features, the strict application of rules related to government procurement contract needs to be alleviated. However, some of the measures which government take in the process of implementing the contract can be challenged in administrative court.
Meanwhile, in PPP contract in a broad sense, contracting-out can be a tool for enhancing efficiency of public administration. But the boundary of contracting out of core function of government (eg. correction) should be carefully set up. In contacting-out core function of government, it is necessary not only to maintain some control by government but also to have a third party monitor the situation.
The term “PPP (Public Private Partnership) contracts” can be applied in two dimensions. In narrow meaning, they refer to contracts only related to PFI (Private Finance Initiative). In a broad sense, they mean contracts related to cooperation between public and private institutions. Contracting-out can be included in the latter meaning of PPP contract.
PPP contract in a narrow sense is characterized by long-term, economic risk transfer to private sector, and therefore mutual trust between public and private institutions is especially important. Considering these features, the strict application of rules related to government procurement contract needs to be alleviated. However, some of the measures which government take in the process of implementing the contract can be challenged in administrative court.
Meanwhile, in PPP contract in a broad sense, contracting-out can be a tool for enhancing efficiency of public administration. But the boundary of contracting out of core function of government (eg. correction) should be carefully set up. In contacting-out core function of government, it is necessary not only to maintain some control by government but also to have a third party monitor the situation.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 비교법적 분석
Ⅲ. 우리나라의 법제분석
Ⅳ. 결론
[Abstract]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
지방자치단체의 수의계약
행정법연구
2005 .10
-
행정조달계약에 있어서 공익(公益)을 위한 계약의 변경 및 해지에 관한 연구
法學論文集
2017 .01
-
공법상 계약의 특수한 법적 규율
외법논집
2010 .01
-
지방자치단체 민간투자사업의 공공성 확보수단에 대한 연구 - 공법상 계약과 행정처분의 관계를 중심으로 -
지방자치법연구
2019 .01
-
영국법상 정부계약과 법치주의
일감법학
2015 .01
-
지방정부의 수의계약 활용 실태와 결정요인 분석
지방정부연구
2018 .11
-
국제계약에 있어서 계약언어의 선택과 효과
중재연구
2005 .01
-
영화산업 종사자관련 계약상의 몇 가지 과제
중앙법학
2011 .12
-
계약사무 이관에 따른 전문성 강화방안 연구
서울연구원 정책과제연구보고서
2010 .12
-
INTERNATIONAL CONTRACT LAWS AND FORMATION OF CONTRACT
국제거래와 법
2011 .12
-
무역계약서 표면약관의 적용상의 유의점에 관한 연구
무역연구
2018 .01
-
公共契約에서 契約金額調整을 排除하는 特約의 效力
행정판례연구
2018 .01
-
신종계약의 법적 규율
재산법연구
2019 .01
-
약관법과 민법의 관계, 계약내용통제 및 일부무효와 관련하여
외법논집
2010 .01
-
장기계약에서 사정변경에 따른 대응방안
무역학회지
2005 .12
-
불공정약관 조항의 유형과 특징 - 최근 3년간 공정거래위원회에서 심결한 계약을 중심으로 -
재산법연구
2009 .01
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0