인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
The infringement on computer programs can be divided into a counterfeiting, disguised imitation, and seeping exceeding legal range.
In such case, it is not difficult to exercise rights by utilizing the legalized civil/criminal relieve means in the case of counterfeiting. As for the act of infringing such as the disguised imitation, however, it is difficult to determine, as the first consideration, whether the imitations have actually infringed upon the program copyright prior to seeking infringement relief means.
In connection with the judgment to be made as above as the first consideration, serious discussions are under way to determine whether the jurisdiction of the infringement relief proceedings should be placed under the ordinary jurisdictional system of civil proceedings as now or should be improved into a centralized jurisdictional system even in the case of the infringement relief proceedings governing other intellectual property rights such as the patent, design and trademark.
In the same context, this paper has discussed desirable ways of improving even the relief proceedings covering the infringement on computer programs. In conclusion, the paper suggests to centralize jurisdiction over the relief proceedings covering the infringement on computer programs, proposing the jurisdiction of the court of first instance to be limited to the principal office of the district courts, and the jurisdiction of the court of the 2nd instance, the appellate trial, to be exclusively placed under the jurisdiction of the patent court.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지In such case, it is not difficult to exercise rights by utilizing the legalized civil/criminal relieve means in the case of counterfeiting. As for the act of infringing such as the disguised imitation, however, it is difficult to determine, as the first consideration, whether the imitations have actually infringed upon the program copyright prior to seeking infringement relief means.
In connection with the judgment to be made as above as the first consideration, serious discussions are under way to determine whether the jurisdiction of the infringement relief proceedings should be placed under the ordinary jurisdictional system of civil proceedings as now or should be improved into a centralized jurisdictional system even in the case of the infringement relief proceedings governing other intellectual property rights such as the patent, design and trademark.
In the same context, this paper has discussed desirable ways of improving even the relief proceedings covering the infringement on computer programs. In conclusion, the paper suggests to centralize jurisdiction over the relief proceedings covering the infringement on computer programs, proposing the jurisdiction of the court of first instance to be limited to the principal office of the district courts, and the jurisdiction of the court of the 2nd instance, the appellate trial, to be exclusively placed under the jurisdiction of the patent court.
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- Ⅰ. 序
- Ⅱ. 컴퓨터프로그램의 침해 유형과 구제수단
- Ⅲ. 컴퓨터프로그램의 침해에 대한 현행 구제소송체계의 문제점 - 지적재산권의 침해에 대한 구제소송체계의 일반적인 문제점과 관련하여
- Ⅳ. 특허권의 침해에 대한 구제소송체계의 개선방향 - 특허권침해에 구제소송의 관할 집중
- Ⅴ. 컴퓨터프로그램의 침해에 대한 구제소송체계의 개선방향 - 컴퓨터프로그램에 대한 침해구제소송의 관할 집중
- 參考文獻
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
