인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
The growth of the Internet over the decade has brought profound changes to the Internetrelated laws. More and more people use internet as a communication tool and consequently, Internet acquired the power of influence. The Internet has the power to build your reputations overnight and also the power to destroy them just as quickly as it had built. Recently problems relating Internet defamation became the social issue as a renowned actress committed suicide after being traumatized by malicious comments posted on Internet message boards.
As if addressing this issue, the Korea Communications Commission(KBC) had proposed an amendment to information and communication network laws imposing more responsibilities to Internet Service Provider(ISP) for monitoring defamatory or obscene postings. Under current laws, ISPs are only required to blank out problematic postings temporarily in order to prevent the improper posting from quickly spreading on the Internet. However, under the proposed amendment, if ISPs do not -at least temporarily- block online postings containing defamatory information even after receiving a complaint, they could be subject to a fine of up to 30 million won.
This article points out the major changes in KBC’s recent proposal including the required blank-out obligation and monitoring obligation of ISPs. It, then, analyzes legal justifications underlying in such requirements and concludes that the proposed amendment has failed to balance freedom of expression and attempts to control the Internet.
As if addressing this issue, the Korea Communications Commission(KBC) had proposed an amendment to information and communication network laws imposing more responsibilities to Internet Service Provider(ISP) for monitoring defamatory or obscene postings. Under current laws, ISPs are only required to blank out problematic postings temporarily in order to prevent the improper posting from quickly spreading on the Internet. However, under the proposed amendment, if ISPs do not -at least temporarily- block online postings containing defamatory information even after receiving a complaint, they could be subject to a fine of up to 30 million won.
This article points out the major changes in KBC’s recent proposal including the required blank-out obligation and monitoring obligation of ISPs. It, then, analyzes legal justifications underlying in such requirements and concludes that the proposed amendment has failed to balance freedom of expression and attempts to control the Internet.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
