인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
The purpose of this study is to find out the significance and role of the national planning system according to the law of ‘Framework Act on the National land’ and ‘National land planning and Utilization Act’, and to clarify the problem of those law and planning system. The process of this study is how to realize the connection and the fitness between the upper and lower plan, mainly its related provision and content of every statutory plan.
The problems of the statutory plan below the new Act(‘Framework Act on the National land’ and ‘National land planning and Utilization Act’) are as follows :
Firstly, it causes to the vagueness what is the subject between ‘Urban Comprehensive Master Plan’ and ‘Urban Management Plan’, because of replacing ‘City and County Comprehensive Plan’ with ‘Urban Plan’.
Secondly, it causes to the confusion with the role of the upper and lower plan, owing to a textual interp retation to complying with the guiding principle and the political direction of ‘Province Comp rehensive Plan’ even ’Metropolitan City’.
Thirdly, there is no the provision which is the authority to be established ‘Urban Comp rehensive Master Plan’ by a provincial governor.
The suggestions are as follows :
Firstly, it must clearly clarify to ‘City and Province Comprehensive Plan’ not only named by ‘ Province Comprehensive Plan’, and to giving a definition of ‘City and County Compre hensive Plan’ as its lower system.
Secondly, the provision in the new Act which is generally applicable to not divide ‘Urban Plan’ into ‘Urban Comprehensive Master Plan’ and ‘Urban Management Plan’ must be definitely pres cribed.
Thirdly, it must have a correct understanding of the status and authority of a provincial govern or, and it also need to prescribe the authority distribution system for their authority to be clear.
The problems of the statutory plan below the new Act(‘Framework Act on the National land’ and ‘National land planning and Utilization Act’) are as follows :
Firstly, it causes to the vagueness what is the subject between ‘Urban Comprehensive Master Plan’ and ‘Urban Management Plan’, because of replacing ‘City and County Comprehensive Plan’ with ‘Urban Plan’.
Secondly, it causes to the confusion with the role of the upper and lower plan, owing to a textual interp retation to complying with the guiding principle and the political direction of ‘Province Comp rehensive Plan’ even ’Metropolitan City’.
Thirdly, there is no the provision which is the authority to be established ‘Urban Comp rehensive Master Plan’ by a provincial governor.
The suggestions are as follows :
Firstly, it must clearly clarify to ‘City and Province Comprehensive Plan’ not only named by ‘ Province Comprehensive Plan’, and to giving a definition of ‘City and County Compre hensive Plan’ as its lower system.
Secondly, the provision in the new Act which is generally applicable to not divide ‘Urban Plan’ into ‘Urban Comprehensive Master Plan’ and ‘Urban Management Plan’ must be definitely pres cribed.
Thirdly, it must have a correct understanding of the status and authority of a provincial govern or, and it also need to prescribe the authority distribution system for their authority to be clear.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-322-002109557
