지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Recently some of Chinese historians mentioned "Koguryo dynasty was not connected with Koryo dynasty, therefore Koguryo has nothing to do with modem Korean". They also asserted "Koryo was not connected with Koguryo because Koryo was succeeded by Silla dynasty. At that time, Koguryo was one of me local governments of Chinese Tang dynasty. Since most of the inhabitants of Koguryo moved to the mainland of Chinese Tang's territory and assimilated the Chinese people after the collapse of Koguryo dynasty, the people of Koguryo is one of the ancient Chinese tribes, therefore the history of Koguryo dynasty is part of Chinese history".
In the mean time, most of Koreans, Chinese, and Japanese with common knowledge of history believe that Koguryo was one of the Three Kingdoms and the people of Koguryo was one group of Koreans. Therefore the whole history of Koguryo is considered to be part of Korean history. From this perspective, the Chinese assertion is strictly wrong interpretation of me connected history.
The officially recorded and published Chinese 25--Sa(25史) shows the connected contents as follows. The people of Koguryo was quite different from Chinese people and Koryo dynasty was succeeded by Koguryo dynasty. Under this kind of criteria, some Chinese historians do not accept this kind of their own historical records and interpretations.
In this paper, the writer tries to prove that the assertion of some Chinese scholars is absolutely wrong interpretations, and to prove that "Koguryo dynasty is one of the ancient Korean dynasties and is succeeded by Koryo dynasty, and me people of Koguryo is one of the Korean peoples".
In the mean time, most of Koreans, Chinese, and Japanese with common knowledge of history believe that Koguryo was one of the Three Kingdoms and the people of Koguryo was one group of Koreans. Therefore the whole history of Koguryo is considered to be part of Korean history. From this perspective, the Chinese assertion is strictly wrong interpretation of me connected history.
The officially recorded and published Chinese 25--Sa(25史) shows the connected contents as follows. The people of Koguryo was quite different from Chinese people and Koryo dynasty was succeeded by Koguryo dynasty. Under this kind of criteria, some Chinese historians do not accept this kind of their own historical records and interpretations.
In this paper, the writer tries to prove that the assertion of some Chinese scholars is absolutely wrong interpretations, and to prove that "Koguryo dynasty is one of the ancient Korean dynasties and is succeeded by Koryo dynasty, and me people of Koguryo is one of the Korean peoples".
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 연구사
Ⅲ. 중공 학자들의 “고구려-고려 무관론“과 이의 비판
Ⅳ. 요약 및 결론
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
고려(高麗)의 고구려(高句麗) 계승성(繼承性)
고구려연구회 학술총서
2008 .07
-
발해국의 주민구성에 관한 연구
인문학논총
2008 .02
-
발해의 영역에서 본 고구려 계승성
고구려발해연구
2006 .03
-
高麗의 高句麗 繼承意識
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
발해문화의 고구려계승
고구려발해연구
2007 .03
-
渤海人이 된 高句麗靺鞨
고구려발해연구
2007 .03
-
발해 부흥국가와 고려의 발해 계승의식
역사와경계
2006 .09
-
高句麗國號考 : 高句麗와 句麗 관계를 중심으로
고구려발해연구
2005 .12
-
韓國 史書에 나타난 高句麗의 正體性
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
高麗
역사학보
1999 .09
-
고구려시대의 말갈 연구
역사와경계
1988 .12
-
高句麗의 繼承性을 通해 본 渤海國의 正體性
고구려발해연구
2004 .12
-
고구려 남진정책의 성격과 그 영향- 평양기 고구려 천하의 위상과 의의 -
대구사학
2009 .01
-
국호 高句麗·高麗에 대한 일고찰
동북아역사논총
2004 .12
-
중화인민공화국 학계의 고구려 유민 연구 검토
고구려발해연구
2007 .12
-
신라성과 고구려성
고구려발해연구
1999 .12
-
高麗朝의 高句麗繼承意識과 古朝鮮認識
역사교육
1988 .06
-
최근 한강 이남에서 발견된 고구려계 고분
고구려발해연구
2010 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-911-019496512