지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2008.3
- 수록면
- 39 - 88 (50page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Since military and national security issues have been under the central government's authority, local government and communities' have not been consulted regarding policy. Even when there has been damage resulting from its directives, those affected have not been adequately compensated. However, as democracy and local self-government have advanced, we are facing a new situation where it is no longer possible for the central government to dictate policy. Such changes have a direct bearing on issues such as the readjustment in the ROK-U.S. alliance and the redeployment of USFK.
Many issues have arisen from the readjustment in the ROK-U.S. alliance, but in this study we will discuss the problems local communities and governments face as a result of redeployment, There has been a dire lack of discussion on how to reflect the interests of those affected. Indeed, while there has been heated debate regarding deployment of USFK troops here, with one side arguing for complete withdrawal the other exclaiming the necessity of the ROK-D.S. alliance, there has been little discussion of how to deal with problems and damage resulting directly from the redeployment of USFK.
Although there is controversy surrounding the development of democracy in South Korea, compare to the period prior to 1987, the so called authoritarianism order era in Korea, it is clear that Korean government has advanced in terms of procedural democracy. Such domestic change in Korea has led to dialogue on national issues like the redeployment of USFK. In this study, we discuss the readjustment in the ROK-U.S. Alliance and USFK problems based on Korean internal change and necessity.
To sum up, "Central government's one-way policy, which does not reflect local communities' interests, has a high possibility of failure." When government decides on policy, it must take into consideration local citizens' opinions, even on issues of national security. Readjustment in the ROK-U.S. Alliance may be determined through inter-governmental discussion between Korea and the U.S.A., but how that policy is conducted is not up to the central government alone. In short, if we hope for a successful, future-oriented development in the ROK-US alliance, our two governments are required to consider both the "what" and "how" of policy.
Many issues have arisen from the readjustment in the ROK-U.S. alliance, but in this study we will discuss the problems local communities and governments face as a result of redeployment, There has been a dire lack of discussion on how to reflect the interests of those affected. Indeed, while there has been heated debate regarding deployment of USFK troops here, with one side arguing for complete withdrawal the other exclaiming the necessity of the ROK-D.S. alliance, there has been little discussion of how to deal with problems and damage resulting directly from the redeployment of USFK.
Although there is controversy surrounding the development of democracy in South Korea, compare to the period prior to 1987, the so called authoritarianism order era in Korea, it is clear that Korean government has advanced in terms of procedural democracy. Such domestic change in Korea has led to dialogue on national issues like the redeployment of USFK. In this study, we discuss the readjustment in the ROK-U.S. Alliance and USFK problems based on Korean internal change and necessity.
To sum up, "Central government's one-way policy, which does not reflect local communities' interests, has a high possibility of failure." When government decides on policy, it must take into consideration local citizens' opinions, even on issues of national security. Readjustment in the ROK-U.S. Alliance may be determined through inter-governmental discussion between Korea and the U.S.A., but how that policy is conducted is not up to the central government alone. In short, if we hope for a successful, future-oriented development in the ROK-US alliance, our two governments are required to consider both the "what" and "how" of policy.
목차
Ⅰ. 문제제기
Ⅱ. 한미동맹의 변화와 주한미군 재배치
Ⅲ. 주한미군 재배치의 주요 쟁점
Ⅳ. 평택 미군기지 이전 사례
Ⅴ. 결론: 정책적 함의
【참고문헌】
[ABSTRACT]
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
한미동맹 재조정과 주한미군 : 경기도의 입장과 정책방향 연구
경기연구원 기본연구
2007 .11
-
주한미군 재배치와 한ㆍ미동맹의 개편방안
통일정책연구
2004 .01
-
An Analysis of Strategic Effects of the ROK-U.S. Alliance and Relocation of the USFK: Implementation and Prospects
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2013 .01
-
The Future of USFK and Its Implication for the Viability of the ROK-U.S. Alliance
한국정치학회보
2004 .12
-
지방정부와 주둔미군과의 상호작용과 협력체제에 관한 연구
한국사회와 행정연구
2005 .05
-
주한미군 재배치와 한·미동맹의 재정립 방향
통일정책연구
2004 .01
-
주한미군과 지역사회간 갈등해소 및 협력 방안
경기논단
2005 .12
-
한미동맹의 발전과 향후과제
한국동북아논총
2005 .06
-
Readjustment of ROK-US Alliance and Strategic Effects of the USFK
The Korean Journal of Security Affairs
2019 .01
-
Inclusive Local Governance System for Ambivalent Relationship and Cohabitation between Local Communities and the USFK : New Agendas for the Pyeongtaek Local Community
지방정부연구
2008 .02
-
한미동맹의 문제점 진단과 한미동맹 강화의 논리
국가전략
2003 .01
-
한ㆍ미 안보동맹의 형성과 변화
사회과학연구
2003 .08
-
6･25전쟁 60주년과 한미동맹의 미래
국방정책연구
2010 .01
-
한미동맹과 전략적 유연성 : 쟁점과 전망
국제정치논총
2006 .12
-
주한미군의 군사력 변화와 한국의 군사력 건설 : 한국의 국방예산 증가율 및 그 추이를 중심으로
국제정치논총
2007 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
미군기지 평택이전에 따른 주한미군과 지역사회간 갈등관리 및 협력제고 방안 연구
김동성
,
최용환
,
Adam Evans
외 1명
정책연구
2006
.06
평택미군기지를 둘러싼 지역사회 갈등의 전개과정과 이의 해소를 위한 도시 거버넌스의 발전방향 : 토지수용 전단계를 중심으로
최승범
한국정책연구
2009
.06
한미동맹 재조정과 주한미군 : 경기도의 입장과 정책방향 연구
최용환
,
박성호
,
김희은
외 1명
경기연구원 기본연구
2007
.11
한국의 대 아프리카 외교의 동학과 대응방안 : 에너지·자원외교를 중심으로
이호영
국제관계연구
2011
.09
‘평택일기’를 통해 본 일생의례와 속신
안혜경
실천민속학연구
2011
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-350-018336434