메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대한건축학회 대한건축학회 논문집 - 계획계 大韓建築學會論文集 計劃系 第25卷 第5號
발행연도
2009.5
수록면
67 - 78 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study proposes to systematically explore and develope learners’ task performance process as validated by problem-based team projects. A whole process of the learners’ task performance that had been taking place during a third year design studio in 2<SUP>nd</SUP> semester, 2008 was carefully monitored and evaluated. Pro-Arc(Professional Architects, a web-based on-line constructivist learning supporting system) was used as the primary monitoring tool and the creative knowledge building machine. Additionally, task performance guidelines and criteria were developed and utilized as a formal set of problems to be provided with learners. In order to explore the learners’ task performance process more effective, problem-based team projects were used.
Data and information cumulated on the Pro-Arc system all throughout the semester were printed out and analyzed. Some ramifications were made. First, the web-based on-line studio class supporting system(so-called, pro-arc) is likely effective in monitoring a process-oriented task performance, rather than the products themselves. Particularly, reflection on actions taking place on the system is likely useful in motivating and promoting the learners’ task performance. Second, complex, systematic, and stepwise projections of a limited number of subproblems rather than a large, single problem need to be used as a teaching and learning tool as these are proved useful in increasing the task performance quality. Third, differences in performing tasks are found among learners. Validity of reasoning developed for actual design is higher for better performers, transformation of reasoning into a visual outcome is more likely to be successfully made by better performers, and meta cognition pursuing the final task performance also is more highly activated for better performers.

목차

Abstract
1. 연구목적
2. 연구디자인
3. 분석방법
4. 결과
5. 결론
참고문헌

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-540-018378785