인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
Kim Koo is one of the most famous politicians in Korea's modem history, who has been a symbolic leader of Korea's nationalism since 1948. Although it was prohibited to deal with him during the Rhee government, his name has been located in the center of independence movement since 1960s in order to legitimize ROK's historical lineage compared to that of the DPRK. However, it is not easy to find an objective and valuable works on him. He has been mentioned as a part of activities in the Provisional Bovernment.
There were two significant debates on him; One is about the Anti-trusteeship movement initiated by him between 1945 and 1947, and the other is evaluation of his participation at the South-North Conference in 1948. The former was triggered by Prof. Suh Joong Suk, who argued that the movement contributed not to unification, but to the division. His argument is getting currency among scholars now. However, most of scholars did not ignore his role in the South-North Conference in 1948 and could not reject his contribution to the unification movement.
The latter was rasied by so-called "New Right Group." According to them, Kim Koo's activities were overestimated because those were not realistic as well as anti-ROK government movement. The group argued that the establishment of the ROK government was a crucial watershed for civilization history of Korea, and Kim Koo did not contribute anything for the establishment.
Now is the time to illuminate him objectively as he was. The ideology and the symbol which covered him should be erased for new research about him. And at the same time, verification of raw materials on him should be conducted by scholars, since most of authors created those materials politically. Kim Koo should be examined not as a nationalist or a leader, but as Kim Koo.
There were two significant debates on him; One is about the Anti-trusteeship movement initiated by him between 1945 and 1947, and the other is evaluation of his participation at the South-North Conference in 1948. The former was triggered by Prof. Suh Joong Suk, who argued that the movement contributed not to unification, but to the division. His argument is getting currency among scholars now. However, most of scholars did not ignore his role in the South-North Conference in 1948 and could not reject his contribution to the unification movement.
The latter was rasied by so-called "New Right Group." According to them, Kim Koo's activities were overestimated because those were not realistic as well as anti-ROK government movement. The group argued that the establishment of the ROK government was a crucial watershed for civilization history of Korea, and Kim Koo did not contribute anything for the establishment.
Now is the time to illuminate him objectively as he was. The ideology and the symbol which covered him should be erased for new research about him. And at the same time, verification of raw materials on him should be conducted by scholars, since most of authors created those materials politically. Kim Koo should be examined not as a nationalist or a leader, but as Kim Koo.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2009-905-018273671
