지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The theme of this article is reprobation, which is the most disputed and controversial element in the doctrine of predestination of John Calvin. The predestination of reprobation means that God predestined some of the human race to be excluded from His Salvation Works, and accordingly, some to be predestined into His Salvation. The most serious critique against reprobation concerns the subject of God's justice. Critics say that it is inconsistent with the love and justice of God. There has recently been an emergence of interest in the theory of universal salvation, and consequently, the doctrine of reprobation has been widely rejected by a growing number of people who view it as unwelcome. However, in this article I will explore the doctrine of reprobation and evaluate whether we should abandon the reprobation doctrine because it is unreasonable or if we should keep it because it is still significant today.
I hope to bring light to the fact that reprobation has biblical basis and is theologically appropriate. I have also concentrated on the relationship between reprobation and the justice of God. The fruits of my study are as following: reprobation is not contradictory to God's justice; therefore we cannot say God is unjust because of reprobation. Here I considered both infralapsarianism and supralapsarianism In the view of infralapsarianism, reprobation becomes a righteous action of God because it is towards the corrupted. In the view of supralapsarianism, reprobation is still a righteous action because it is God's decision. In the latter we should consider who the judge of justice and injustice is. Calvin asserts that the judge is God himself. That is, if it is God's will it is just, but if it is contradictory to God's will it is unjust.
Calvin says that the will of God is expressed in the Scriptures and that human reason is unable to understand the whole of the will of God as revealed in the Scriptures. Therefore human reason cannot be the ultimate basis of judgment between justice and injustice. Consequently, the subject of whether or not we should approve of the doctrine of reprobation goes back to whether we should follow the authority of the Scriptures or of human reason. And on this matter Calvin asserts his principle of theology that we should obey only the authority of the Scriptures and not of human reason. Therefore, it is right that we believe and teach the predestination of reprobation according to the Scriptures, though it is scandalous and unwelcome to human reason.
I hope to bring light to the fact that reprobation has biblical basis and is theologically appropriate. I have also concentrated on the relationship between reprobation and the justice of God. The fruits of my study are as following: reprobation is not contradictory to God's justice; therefore we cannot say God is unjust because of reprobation. Here I considered both infralapsarianism and supralapsarianism In the view of infralapsarianism, reprobation becomes a righteous action of God because it is towards the corrupted. In the view of supralapsarianism, reprobation is still a righteous action because it is God's decision. In the latter we should consider who the judge of justice and injustice is. Calvin asserts that the judge is God himself. That is, if it is God's will it is just, but if it is contradictory to God's will it is unjust.
Calvin says that the will of God is expressed in the Scriptures and that human reason is unable to understand the whole of the will of God as revealed in the Scriptures. Therefore human reason cannot be the ultimate basis of judgment between justice and injustice. Consequently, the subject of whether or not we should approve of the doctrine of reprobation goes back to whether we should follow the authority of the Scriptures or of human reason. And on this matter Calvin asserts his principle of theology that we should obey only the authority of the Scriptures and not of human reason. Therefore, it is right that we believe and teach the predestination of reprobation according to the Scriptures, though it is scandalous and unwelcome to human reason.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 : 문제제기
Ⅱ. 유기 교리의 근거
Ⅲ. 유기와 하나님의 의
Ⅳ. 결론 : 성경이냐 이성이냐?
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
A Reformed Understanding of Grace from John Calvin to C. S. Song
신학논단
2009 .12
-
신명기 역사에 나타난 ‘하나님의 사람’ 구절 연구 : 왕상 12:33~13:34
신학과 목회
2018 .11
-
Who is God
Catholic Theology and Thought
2016 .06
-
중세의 예정론― 토마스 아퀴나스 사상을 중심으로
한국조직신학논총
2018 .01
-
개혁주의 신학과 웨슬리안 신학의 대화를 위한 칼뱅의 이중예정론과 웨슬리의 예지예정론 비교 연구
한국기독교신학논총
2013 .07
-
칼빈의 신론 : 초월과 임재의 변증법적 하나님
한국기독교신학논총
2004 .10
-
"'하나님의교회 세계복음선교협회'의 교리 비판"
신학과 목회
2011 .11
-
“칼빈의 생애에 나타난 영성 이해”
신학과 목회
2010 .11
-
칼빈의 창조론
창조론오픈포럼
2008 .01
-
칼빈의 신관
신학정론
1995 .06
-
Meister Eckhart의 하나님 이해와 하나님 아들의 삶
신학논단
2009 .06
-
바울을 모델로 한 대학 복음화 방안
대학과 복음
2004 .12
-
인간의 행복에 대한 기독교적인 이해
행복한 부자연구
2016 .12
-
비극으로서의 「욥기」 다시 읽기 —욥의 고난과 신의 자유를 중심으로—
고전 르네상스 영문학
2011 .01
-
학습자의 하나님 개념 이해: 문헌분석
기독교교육정보
2000 .09
-
하나님의 예정과 우리 인간의 인식
신학정론
1998 .05
-
진리와 인간의 신학적 이해
인문학논총
2001 .08
-
정의에 대한 그리스도론적인 고찰
신학과 목회
2014 .05
-
Religion of God-Human Being
Korea Journal
1963 .05
-
칼빈의 섭리론
창조론오픈포럼
2012 .08
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0100-2009-230-018285042